How Is Work Calculated on an Elevator Cab in Physics Problems?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the work done on an elevator cab by the force from a cable while considering the forces acting on both the cab and a block of cheese inside it. The solution manual's approach is questioned, particularly the inclusion of the normal force as an external force when analyzing the system. Participants agree that the correct equation should either exclude the cheese's weight when calculating the cable force or treat the forces acting on the cab separately. The consensus is that the solution manual's method is flawed, and the alternative equations provided are valid for determining the work done on the cab. Clarification on the treatment of internal versus external forces is crucial for accurate calculations in physics problems involving systems.
user14245
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
The problem
A 0.250 \operatorname{kg} block of cheese lies on the floor of a 900 \operatorname{kg} elevator cab that is being pulled upward by a cable through distance d_1 = 2.40 \operatorname{m} and then through distance d_2=10.5 \operatorname{m}. Through d_1, if the normal force on the block from the floor has constant magnitude F_N = 3.00\operatorname{N}, how much work is done on the cab by the force from the cable?
From Fundamentals of Physics, 9th Editon, Problem 25, Chapter 7

My solution manual
Here is what my solution manual says:
The net upward force is given by F + F_N-(m+M)g = (m+M)a where m=0.250 \operatorname{kg} is the mass of the cheese, M = 900 \operatorname{kg} is the mass of the elevator cab, F is the force from the cable, and F_N = 3.00 \operatorname{N} is the normal force on the cheese. On the cheese alone, we have F_N - mg = ma, and etc..., the solution continues

My question
I do not see why the first equation is correct. To me, the force F_N is internal between the cab and the block, so once one considers both as a system and applies the Newton's second law, the equation should read F - (m+M)g = (m+M)a.

Is the solution manual wrong, or am I overlooking something?
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's about the notation as you could have done it your way, that is split the F into Fn(cheese) Fc(cab) and you would get the same result. In your notation you just consider F as the total force not just the force that acts on the cab. The question is how much work is done on the cab, and not cab + cheese.
 
user14245 said:
I do not see why the first equation is correct. To me, the force F_N is internal between the cab and the block, so once one considers both as a system and applies the Newton's second law, the equation should read F - (m+M)g = (m+M)a.

Is the solution manual wrong, or am I overlooking something?
Thank you.
Putting aside the issue of work for a moment, the solution manual for the calculation for the force in the cable is incorrect. Your equation is correct.
Alternatively, if you want to calculate the cable force by first incorporating the normal force exerted by the cheese on the cab, then you must not include the cheese weight in the formula, because it is not part of the FBD for forces acting on the cab.

So, use either
F - (m+M)g = (m+M)a, or


F - F_N - Mg = Ma.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top