How Likely Is It That Two Points on a Segmented Line Are Less Than 20cm Apart?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chrisphd
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the probability that two randomly chosen points from a 60cm segmented line, divided into two 30cm halves, are less than 20cm apart. Participants analyze the problem using uniform distribution and discrete values, ultimately determining that there are 210 combinations of points that meet the distance requirement out of 961 total possibilities, yielding a probability of approximately 0.2185. Another approach involves graphing the possible values and calculating the area under a line representing the distance constraint, resulting in a probability of 0.222. Both methods provide consistent results, confirming the calculations are accurate. The discussion emphasizes the importance of visualizing the problem to understand the relationships between the points.
chrisphd
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Consider a line segment of length 60cm, divided in half (30 cm/half). A point is randomly chosen from the first half of the line segment, and another point is randomly chosen from the second half of the line segment. What is the probability that the distance between the two points is less than 20cm?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
chrisphd said:
Consider a line segment of length 60cm, divided in half (30 cm/half). A point is randomly chosen from the first half of the line segment, and another point is randomly chosen from the second half of the line segment. What is the probability that the distance between the two points is less than 20cm?

From the information you have said, both points are chosen from independent parts of the string.

So consider X,Y ~ Uniform(30).

Lets say P(X = x) and P(Y = y) refers to the probability of getting a value x (or y) cm's from the center of the string. You can do this because of the nature of a uniform distribution.

That means that you have to find P(X + Y < 20).

Show us some working out and I will give you more hints.
 
Well...I am no physicist...I am just an engineer...so, for me this is good enough:

as an approximation...let's assume that x and y can only assume discrete values from 0 to 30...that's 31 possible values each, for a total of 31x31=961 possibilities

but when you add x and y, only 210 combinations add to < 20...

so Prob = 210/961 = 0.2185
 
let x be distance along 1st segment, and y be distance along 2nd segment. x and y are both random and independent, so we can treat them as a pair (x,y).
How do we work out the possible values of (x,y)? Draw a graph with x-axis and y axis, up to x=30 and y=30. All coordinates in this range correspond to possible (x,y) values.
Draw a straight line from (0,20) to (20,0). Everywhere along this line (eg. (20,0),(19,1) etc.) all have distance from each other equal to 20. Everywhere under this line is less than 20, and above greater than 20.

Area under this line = 20*20/2. Total area of possibility space = 30*30. Prob of distance less than 20 = 20*20/(2*30*30) = 2/9 = 0.222. This is consistent with engineers approximation so I think my method is right.

Thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top