How Long Does a Call Take Between Quito and Belem via Satellite?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the time for a satellite call between Quito and Belem, one must consider the satellite's altitude of 3.2 X 10^7 m and the distance of 3.7 X 10^6 m between the two cities. The problem involves applying geometry to determine the total distance the signal travels, which includes the round trip to the satellite. The speed of light is crucial, as all electromagnetic signals travel at this speed. By drawing a diagram to visualize the right triangles formed, one can compute the necessary lengths and subsequently calculate the time taken for the call. Understanding these concepts is essential for solving the problem effectively.
osustudent2010
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I've got a question I'm working on:


A communications satellite is in an orbit that is 3.2 X 10^7 m directly above the equator. Consider the moment when the satellite is located midway between Quito, Equador, and Belem, Brazil; two cities almost on the equator that are separated by a distance of 3.7 X 10^6 m. Find the time it takes for a telephone call to go by the way of satellite between these cities. Ignore the curvature of the earth.

-- eek! I'm not sure where to start! Is this related to the speed of light in any way?

thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, this involves the speed of light, but the main work is geometry of right triangles. Draw a picture that shows the relationship described, compute the lengths involved and proceed from there.
 
All electromagnetic waves travel at the speed of light, I'm assuming theyre talking abuot a geosynchronous orbit where the satelite is in a fixed position.
 
thanks-- all i need to to was draw a picture :)

thanks again
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top