How Long Does It Take for a Particle on a String to Move Through 1.0 km?

AI Thread Summary
A wave traveling through a string at 450 m/s with a wavelength of 0.18 m and an amplitude of 2.0 mm raises the question of how long it takes for a particle on the string to move through 1.0 km. The initial calculation of 2.22 seconds was incorrect, as it conflated the wave's speed with the particle's motion. Understanding that the particles of the string oscillate vertically while the wave moves horizontally clarifies the relationship between amplitude, frequency, and the time taken. The correct time for a particle to move through this distance is 5.0 seconds. This distinction between wave motion and particle motion is crucial for solving similar physics problems.
hartfan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A wave is moving through a string at 450 m/s. The wavelength is 0.18 m and the amplitude is 2.0 mm. What is the time required for a particle on the string to move through 1.0 km? (The answer given is 5.0x10 s).


Homework Equations


The only equations I can think of are the ones relating frequency, period, wave speed and wavelength, where wave speed = wave length x frequency. The period is the inverse of frequency.


The Attempt at a Solution


If I divided the 1.0 km by the wave speed, I get 2.22 s. I don't know how else the 1.0 km is related to anything else, and can't figure out how the amplitude has to do with anything. How do you even find the function of the wave? This has been bothering me for almost a week now and I've been looking up every physics text I can find in the library and none of them could offer me a solution. Please help. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't mix up the motion of the wave itself--governed by that speed = wave length X frequency formula--with the motion of the particles of the string. The wave moves along the string, but which way do the particles of the string move? That's where the amplitude (and the frequency) comes in.
 
Doc Al said:
Don't mix up the motion of the wave itself--governed by that speed = wave length X frequency formula--with the motion of the particles of the string. The wave moves along the string, but which way do the particles of the string move? That's where the amplitude (and the frequency) comes in.

Wow. I finally get it now. Thanks for the brilliant tip. I don't know why I never thought of it that way before.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top