How Long Will It Take to Travel 65 Light-Years at Relativistic Speeds?

AI Thread Summary
Traveling to a star 65 light-years away at a speed that makes the distance appear as 25 light-years involves understanding relativistic effects like length contraction and time dilation. The user initially attempted to calculate the velocity using the length contraction equation but encountered an error in applying the time dilation formula, resulting in an incorrect time estimate of 25 years instead of the expected 27 years. Clarification was provided that if the distance and velocity are known, time can be calculated simply with the formula t = d/v. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying relativistic equations to avoid confusion. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that understanding the relationship between distance, velocity, and time is crucial in solving such problems.
persephoneia
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose you decide to travel to a star 65 light-years away at a speed that tells you the distance is only 25 light-years. How many years would it take you to make the trip?

Homework Equations


∆t=∆t0/(√ (1−v2/c2 )) / ∆t0 = ∆t √(1−v2/c2)
L=L0√ (1−v2/c2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I've attempted to use the length contraction equation to find the velocity (v=c√(1-(25/65)^2) but when I plug that into the time dilation equation I don't get the correct answer. I get 25 when the answer should be 27. Where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
persephoneia said:

Homework Statement


Suppose you decide to travel to a star 65 light-years away at a speed that tells you the distance is only 25 light-years. How many years would it take you to make the trip?

Homework Equations


∆t=∆t0/(√ (1−v2/c2 )) / ∆t0 = ∆t √(1−v2/c2)
L=L0√ (1−v2/c2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I've attempted to use the length contraction equation to find the velocity (v=c√(1-(25/65)^2) but when I plug that into the time dilation equation I don't get the correct answer. I get 25 when the answer should be 27. Where am I going wrong?

If you know the distance in your frame and the velocity in your frame, what do you need time dilation for?
 
PeroK said:
If you know the distance in your frame and the velocity in your frame, what do you need time dilation for?
I don't. I wasn't thinking that light years is also a distance because I looking at an example for the problem that combined the two equations (length contraction & time dilation) which threw me off. It's basically t=d/v after you figure out velocity right?
 
persephoneia said:
I don't. I wasn't thinking that light years is also a distance because I looking at an example for the problem that combined the two equations (length contraction & time dilation) which threw me off. It's basically t=d/v after you figure out velocity right?

Right!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top