How Long Will My Camcorder Battery Last?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jennifer2010
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Battery
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on estimating how long a portable power pack can run two camcorders with specific power consumption. Camcorder #1 has a power consumption of 7.4W, while Camcorder #2's consumption is assumed to be similar. The power pack has a capacity of 9Ah at 12V, equating to approximately 388,800 Joules of energy. Given the camcorder's consumption, it can run for about 14.6 hours on this power pack. Additionally, using a direct connection from the power pack to the camcorders is recommended for better efficiency, avoiding unnecessary power loss from converters.
Jennifer2010
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey guys!

I have two camcorders.

Cam #1: Power Supply: DC 7.2V (battery)
Power Consumption: 7.4W

Cam #2: Power Supply: DC 7.4V (battery)
Power Consumption: Doesn't say :( - but should be the same roughly.

How long can a "portable powerpack" with the following specs keep these camcorders running before running out of power?:

Capacity: 1000VA / 500W
Output:
Nominal Voltage: 120V / 230V
Battery Capacity: 12V / 9Ah x 1pc (think it says 1pc cause it's a UPC for computers?)

Could someone please let me know the math on how to figure this out myself for future equations, too?

Thanks so much!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi.

The potential difference/voltage between the battery poles tells you how much energy (in Joules) is available per unit of charge (1 As). Short: Higher voltage means a single charge carrier can do more work for you.

A charge capacity of 9 Ah tells you, that the battery can drive a current of 9 A for an hour, or:
that it stores 9 A * 3600 s = 32400 As of charge. A unit of charge can do 12 J of work (12 V = 12 J/As) and you have 32400 units of charge. Consequently you have 12 V * 32400 As = 388800 J available.

Your camera consumes 7,4 W = 7,4 J/s on average. Which tells you that it should run for 388800 J * s / 7,4 J =52541 s = 14,6 h. Which is a lot, but then again you have a very big battery - capacity is on par with a car battery.

I do not understand these two lines though:
Capacity: 1000VA / 500W
Nominal Voltage: 120V / 230V
I am guessing that your 12V battery has a built in 12 V DC to 120 V or (switch) 230 V AC converter - since you said it is a PC reserve unit. So the second line represents possible output voltages and the first one maximum power output respectively (1000 W at 120 V and 500 W at 230 V). Be sure to use an adapter/converter (120 V to 7,4 V or 230 V to 7,4 V) or you will roast your equipment.

It would also be better (more efficient) to bypass the built-in converter and go straight from 12 V to 7,4 V, because converters are not perfect and each one degrades battery efficiency (battery time).
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top