How long would it take for a freight train to accelerate to 77.6 km/h from rest?

  • Thread starter Thread starter D3mon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Physics
AI Thread Summary
To determine how long it takes for a freight train with a mass of 2.8 × 10^7 kg to accelerate to 77.6 km/h from rest, one must first calculate the acceleration using the force exerted by the locomotive, which is 8.1 × 10^5 N. The acceleration can be found using Newton's second law, F=ma. After finding the acceleration, kinematic equations can be applied to calculate the time required to reach the desired speed, ensuring that the final velocity is converted from kilometers per hour to meters per second. The final calculated time for the train to reach 77.6 km/h is 745.13 seconds. Proper unit conversion is crucial for accurate results.
D3mon
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A freight train has a mass of 2.8 × 10^7 kg.
If the locomotive can exert a constant pull
of 8.1 × 10^5 N, how long would it take to
increase the speed of the train from rest to
77.6 km/h? (Disregard friction.) Answer in
units of s.

Homework Equations



F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried everything, but I really have no clue on how to do this problem, if anyone can point me in the right direction or tell some formulas that would help it would be much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You know the force.

You know the mass.

So surely you have the acceleration don't you?

And if you have acceleration what it that? Isn't that the rate of change of velocity? And if you know how fast velocity is changing can't you figure how long it will take to get to that speed?
 
Do it in two steps:
(1) Find the acceleration.
(2) Use kinematics to find the time. (Convert that speed to standard units: m/s.)
 
Thanks guys I found my mistake

It was I kept finding the acceleration in m/s and never changed the final velocity from k/h to m/s

The answer was 745.13 seconds
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top