How Many Base States Should Incompatible Observable B Have?

  • Thread starter Thread starter giants86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    observables
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the number of base states for incompatible observable B, it is suggested that B should have four base states to align with observable A's finite states. However, there is consideration for B's states to be a subspace of A's basis, allowing for combinations like (1') and (2') that do not include contributions from all of A's states. The idea of representing states 3 and 4 in B is also acknowledged, indicating a need for a comprehensive representation. Ultimately, the relationship between the two observables highlights the complexities of quantum mechanics and the implications of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. The conclusion emphasizes the necessity of careful consideration in defining the base states for incompatible observables.
giants86
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Say I have two incompatible observables A and B. A has a finite number of base states say 4. How many base states should B have?

Homework Equations



Heisenberg's uncertainty

AB - BA <> 0

The Attempt at a Solution



I guess the answer is 4 as A and B basis states should form basis in the same space, but not very sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with that.
 
have a second thought. If A's states are (1), (2), (3), (4), can't B states be a subspace of that basis, such as (1') = 1/sqrt(2) [(1) + (2)]; (2') = 1/sqrt(2) [(1)- (2)], no contribution from (3) and (4)?
 
State 3 and 4 need some representation in B, too.
(1',2') can be rotated (1,2).
 
You are right, thanks
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top