How Many Half-Lives Are Needed for Specific Decay Percentages?

AI Thread Summary
To determine how many half-lives are needed for 90% and 99% decay of a radioactive sample, the equations N=No(1/2)^(t/t1/2) and N=No(1/2)^(n) are used. The variable "n" represents the number of half-lives, which can be calculated from the ratio of N to No, even without knowing the specific half-life value. Understanding that t/t1/2 equates to the number of half-lives clarifies the problem. This approach allows for the calculation of decay percentages based on the number of half-lives elapsed. The discussion effectively resolves the confusion regarding the relationship between time and half-lives in radioactive decay calculations.
Sarah88
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How many half-lives must elapse until (a) 90% and (b) 99% of a radioactive sample of atoms has decayed?


Homework Equations



N=No(1/2)^(t/t1/2)
N=No(1/2)^(n)

The Attempt at a Solution



The part of the solution I don't understand is how to get the second equation N=No(1/2)^n from N=No(1/2)^(t/t1/2). In other words, why is t/t1/2 grouped into the variable "n" if we don't know the value for t or the half life? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Question asks about "how many half lives", t/t1/2 is just that - number of half lives.
 
The number of half-lives (n) is the question. You do not know the half life, but you can calculate n from the ratio of N/No.

ehild
 
Ok, that makes a lot more sense, thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top