How Many Oscillations to Reduce Amplitude by 1000 in a Damped System?

AI Thread Summary
A mass-spring system with a damping constant of 1.00 Ns/m, spring constant of 1.00 N/m, and mass of 1.00 kg is analyzed to determine how many oscillations are needed to reduce the amplitude by a factor of 1000. The relevant equation involves the exponential decay of amplitude over time, expressed as x(t) = A e^(-bt/2m). The user struggles to relate the exponential decay to the required amplitude reduction, seeking clarification on the calculations. A retired teacher suggests using the natural logarithm to solve the equation e^x = 0.001, leading to the conclusion that the answer is two oscillations. This method effectively demonstrates how to derive the necessary number of oscillations for significant amplitude reduction in a damped system.
frostking
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A mass spring system has the following parameters: damping constant is 1.00 Ns/m spring constant is 1.00N/m and mass is 1.00 kg The mass is displaced from equilibrium and released. Through what minimum number of oscillations must the mass move in order to reduce the initial amplitude by a factor of 1000 or more?


Homework Equations


x(t) = A e ^(-bt/2m) angular accel W = (k/m - b^2/4m^2)^(1/2) T = 2pi/w


The Attempt at a Solution



I computed w and got 0.86 I know that e ^(-bt/2m) is equal to or less than 1/1000 But this is where I get stuck. Some number times w needs to be less than 1/1000 the original amplitude but...I cannot see how to get there. I know from the solution sheet that the answer is two but can someone please show me how to get there? Thanks, Frostking
 
Physics news on Phys.org
frostking, I'm the retired high school teacher here to give a helping hand when I can. It looks like you've got an exponential that needs to be inverted into a log. When you have e^x = .001, you can take the natural log of both sides to get x = ln(.001). I hope that will be useful!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top