How many rotations of peddels per second?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mmoadi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Per Rotations
AI Thread Summary
A cyclist traveling at 18 km/h requires a pedal rotation rate calculated using the formula v = 2(pi)r * f. After converting the speed to 5 m/s and the wheel radius to 0.35 m, the initial calculation yields approximately 2.27 rotations per second. Considering the 2:1 gear ratio, the final calculation suggests that the pedals must turn 4.55 times per second. However, clarification on the gear ratio indicates that for every 2 rotations of the pedals, the rear wheel completes one rotation, leading to a corrected final answer of 1.14 rotations per second. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately interpreting gear ratios in bicycle mechanics.
mmoadi
Messages
149
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A bicycle drives on a straight road with a velocity v = 18 km/h. How many turns (rotations) of peddles per second must be carried out by cyclists, if the radius of the wheels r = 35 cm, and the ratio of the radii of front and rear gear wheels is 2:1?

Homework Equations



I used formula v=2(pi)r * f

The Attempt at a Solution

So, I have another problem which says:

I converted: 18km/h = 5m/s and 35cm = 0.35m, so now we have all units unified.

I plugged the numbers into the formula and got the result f= 2.27.

And now we have the ratio 2:1, and since the the front gear wheel is larger than the rear one I multiplied by 2 and got the FINAL result which is 4.55 turns of peddles per second.
Are my calculations correct?
Thank you for all the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the ratio of the gears is 2:1 doesn't that mean 2revs of the pedals to each rotation of the rear wheel?
 
So that mean that I have to divide by to and the correct final answer is f= 1.14?
 
Yes -
Twice the radaii on the front cog means that it rotates once for 2 rotations of the back cog (and hence the back wheel) - this is the normal gearing for a bike (except the lowest gear on a mountain bike) - I thought the question had claimed the opposite.
 
Thank you for your help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top