How many stars in our galaxy if they had the mass of our Sun.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around estimating the mass of the Milky Way Galaxy based on the Sun's orbit. The Sun is approximately 30,000 light years from the center and completes a rotation every 200 million years. The gravitational acceleration formula, g = GM/r^2, is referenced, along with the centripetal acceleration formula, a = v^2/r. An attempt to calculate the acceleration yielded a small positive value, indicating the mass distribution is concentrated in a central sphere. The ultimate goal is to determine how many stars, each with the mass of the Sun, would exist in the galaxy based on this mass estimation.
balletgirl
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The Sun rotates about the center of the Milky Way Galaxy at a distance of about 3.00x10^4 light years from the center (1ly= 9.50x10^5 m). If it takes about 200 million years to make one rotation, estimate the mass of our galaxy. Assume the mass distribution of our galaxy is concentrated mostly in a central uniform sphere. If all the stars had about the same mass as our Sun, how many stars would there be in our galaxy?


Homework Equations



I have no clue, the most common equation I use is g=GM/r^2 and a=v^2/r.

The Attempt at a Solution



I do not know where to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Treat the galaxy as if it was a planet that the sun was orbiting.
 
Well, g is just gravitational acceleration, and is the a in a=v^2/r... but there's an equation missing.


a=\frac{4 \pi^2 r}{T^2}
 
Okay, so I did T= 200,000,000 yrs = 6.31x10^15 s
& R= 2.85x10^20

a=4pi^2*r/T^2
a= 4(3.14)^2*(2.85x10^20)/(6.31x10^15s)
a=39.4(2.85x10^20)/3.98x10^31
a= 2.81x10^-10

I doubt this is right since it is negative
 
No it's not... the exponent is negative, but the number is positive, just very small. And it should be small...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top