How Much Charge Is Needed to Levitate a Car Using Static Electricity?

AI Thread Summary
To levitate a 1200kg car using static electricity, the charge needed can be calculated by equating gravitational force and electrostatic force. The gravitational force is determined using the formula Fg = Gm1m2/d^2, where m1 is the mass of the Earth and m2 is the mass of the car. The electrostatic force can be calculated using F = kq1q2/d^2, with q1 and q2 being equal charges on the car and Earth. Initial calculations resulted in an incorrect charge of 5.3x10^7 C, while the correct charge is 7.3x10^3 C, which requires taking the square root of the calculated value. Clarification on the calculation process helped resolve the misunderstanding.
toasted
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Imagine that space invaders could deposit extra electrons in equal amounts on the Earth and on your car, which has a mass of 1200kg. Note that the rubber tires would provide some insulation. How much charge Q would need to be placed on your car (same amount on earth) in order to levitate it (overcome gravity)? (Hint: Assume the separation distance is the radius of the Earth- and that the Earth's charge is sprea uniformly so it acts as if it were located at the Earth's center.)

Homework Equations



Fg =Gm1m2/ d2

and possily: F= kq1q2/d2

The Attempt at a Solution



So i think you would first find the force of gravity between the Earth and the car, however from there I am not sure how you would determine the charge from that in order to lift the car. Could someone please help me with this part?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Equate G*m1*m2/d^2=k*q1*q2/d^2. m1 is mass of the earth, m2 is mass of the car and the problem told you q1=q2=Q.
 
Dick said:
Equate G*m1*m2/d^2=k*q1*q2/d^2. m1 is mass of the earth, m2 is mass of the car and the problem told you q1=q2=Q.

I tried the technique that you said and I got the charge to be 5.3x 107C, but according to my teacher i was suppose to get 7.3 x 103C. Could you try to clarify why i got this answer? When you try it what answer do you get?
 
I get the same thing your teacher got. Maybe you'd better show your work.
 
toasted said:
I tried the technique that you said and I got the charge to be 5.3x 107C, but according to my teacher i was suppose to get 7.3 x 103C. Could you try to clarify why i got this answer? When you try it what answer do you get?

I think your number is 5.3*10^7 coulombs^2=Q^2. You have to take a square root to get Q.
 
Dick said:
I think your number is 5.3*10^7 coulombs^2=Q^2. You have to take a square root to get Q.

O I forgot that I had q2 on top! thank you so much for your help, and explaining it through!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top