How much did Scott Carpenter age less when he orbited the earth 22 times?

  • Thread starter Thread starter genesis1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Age Earth
genesis1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Scott Carpenter orbited the Earth 22 times in 1962. Assuming he was 160 km above Earth in a circular orbit, determine the time difference between someone on the Earth and Carpenter for the 22 orbits.

Homework Equations


L = Lp(1 - v^2/c^2)^.5 delta t = t /(1 -v^2/c^2)^.5 Note the t on right hand side of equation is the proper time.


The Attempt at a Solution


All that is given in the problem is the proper length 160,000m. The problem does not specify how fast Carpenter is moving or how long it took to complete one orbit. Obviously Carpenter is going to be measuring proper time and delta t is the time someone measures on the Earth. I have tried solving for v in the first equation and substitute in the second equation. Still leaves you with three unknown variables.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you know the radius of the orbit, you can determine how fast he is moving and how long it took. He is in orbit so the acceleraton must be the acceleration due to gravity at that height.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top