How much discrepency would I get if I used acceleration due to gravity?

AI Thread Summary
Using 9.8 m/s² for the acceleration of a falling object generally yields accurate results for most objects, particularly those with greater mass like a cricket ball, where air resistance has minimal impact. However, for lighter objects such as a ping pong ball, air resistance can significantly affect the outcome, leading to discrepancies in calculated distance. The equation d = -1/2 * a * t² is applicable, but the accuracy depends on the object's mass and the height from which it is dropped. Measurement errors in timing can also contribute to discrepancies, but the fundamental issue lies in the equation's assumption of negligible air resistance. Overall, while the formula is reliable for heavier objects, caution should be exercised with lighter ones due to potential significant errors.
sodium40mg
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
How much error would I get if I used 9.8 m/s^2 as the acceleration for a falling object in an experiment? For example, if I have a ball at, say, shoulder's length up in the air and I had someone measure the time it took for the ball to hit the ground. Would I get a lot of error if I used the equation
d = vi * t - 1/2 * a * t^2

Where vi = 0 m/s, so d = -1/2 * a * t^2 and a = - 9.8 m/s^2

Would that actually equal the distance from the shoulder length to the ground or how much error would I get? Would it be significant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well exactly where are you trying to examine the erorr from? The fact that you're only using 2 significant figures?
 
sodium40mg said:
How much error would I get if I used 9.8 m/s^2 as the acceleration for a falling object in an experiment? For example, if I have a ball at, say, shoulder's length up in the air and I had someone measure the time it took for the ball to hit the ground. Would I get a lot of error if I used the equation


Would that actually equal the distance from the shoulder length to the ground or how much error would I get? Would it be significant?

Are you talking about measurement error in the timing?

Or are you talking more fundamentally about the applicability of the equation to the real world problem? The biggest discrepancy in the fundamental equation would be that it ignores air resistance. For a ball dropped from about head height the velocity is fairly low so for in most cases the effect of air resistance would be small, but if the ball was extremely low in mass then air resistance could significantly alter the result. In other words, the formula should be quite accurate for a cricket ball but not necessarily so for a ping pong ball.
 
Here's a quick test of whether air resistance will be significant.

Final velocity (ideally) when dropped from 1.8m = 5.9 m/s

Air density at 20C, rho = 1.2 kg/m^2

1. Cricket ball. m = 0.16 kg, frontal area A = 0.0041 m^2, coeff of drag, cd = 0.47.

Air resistance at final velocity, F = 1/2 rho cd A v^2 = 0.041 N

Comparing the above with the force due to gravity of 1.6N we see that the drag is negligible.

2. Pin pong ball. Mass = 0.0027 kg, Frontal area A = 0.00126 m^2, drag coeff cd = 0.47

Air resistance at (ideal) final velocity, F = 1/2 rho cd A v^2 = 0.0125 N.

Comparing the above with the gravitational force of just 0.027 N we see that air resistance would be very significant in this case.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top