How much does an ME actually use Chemistry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sydneyfranke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry
AI Thread Summary
Concerns about the relevance of chemistry in mechanical engineering (ME) are common among students facing challenges in their chemistry courses. While the application of chemistry varies within the field, it is acknowledged that a solid understanding of basic chemistry principles is beneficial, especially in courses like materials science and thermodynamics. Students may not need to apply chemistry extensively in every aspect of ME, but they should be aware of the chemical properties of materials they work with. Overall, maintaining a decent grasp of fundamental chemistry concepts is sufficient for success in ME, despite initial difficulties in chemistry classes.
sydneyfranke
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
I'm kind of afraid of the answer that I might get here, but maybe if I know I can just face it and get through it. I'm having a pretty tough time in my current Chem class. I usually eventually figure it out, but it takes more work at it than, say my Algebra classes. I know I am going to have to take at least another Chem and then courses such as thermodynamics, but I am just wanting to know how much Chem is carried over into real world situations with ME. I realize it's a lot of "applied math" like a lot of engineering, and that makes me a little nervous because of the trouble I am having wrapping my head around some of the problems. Idk, it's pretty disheartening, but I usually find my way through it and have a B so far (last exam next week and finals in two weeks so a lot can change). Anyways, I am just looking for a little advice. I have enjoyed all of my math classes this semester, but I have pretty much hated every moment in Chem. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It totally depends. ME is such a broad field. You will probably use chem in a materials course too. In the real world though, it's impossible to say. It's definitely possible to get by without using much chem, but you'll still need to keep in mind the chemical properties of whatever materials you're working with.
 
Thanks so much for the help!
 
as mentioned, it varies quite a bit. I'm just finishing a materials science class that uses a number of basic chemistry principles. Like you mentioned, thermodynamics uses quite a bit of chem too. But the bottom line is I wouldn't take that as a detriment. As long as you have a decent grasp on basic chemistry ideas, you should be fine in ME.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
670
Replies
23
Views
4K
Back
Top