How Much Does the Spring Compress When an Elevator Falls on It?

  • Thread starter Thread starter whereisccguys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elevator Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the compression of a spring when an elevator falls onto it after a cable break. The initial velocity of the elevator just before impact is calculated to be 20.19 m/s, and the conservation of energy principle is applied to equate gravitational potential energy with spring potential energy. A user encounters difficulties with their calculations and is advised to double-check units, signs, and the formula used for work done by the spring. Suggestions include verifying the initial velocity's sign and ensuring correct application of the energy conservation equation. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful calculation and potential collaboration for problem-solving.
whereisccguys
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Problem: An elevator cable breaks when a 754 kg elevator is 20.8 m above the top of a huge spring (k = 6.93×104 N/m) at the bottom of the shaft. Calculate the amount the spring compresses (note that here work is done by both the spring and gravity).

i calculated the speed of the elevator just before it hits the spring which is
Vinitial = 20.19 m/s

the equation i used was (1/2)mV^2-(1/2)mVinitial^2= -(1/2)kx^2 + mgx
x is the distance the spring was compressed
and at distance x the current velocity = 0 because it is not moving at all anymore
therefore the equation becomes -(1/2)mVinitial^2= -(1/2)kx^2 + mgx
i plugged in all the numbers and solved by the quadratic equation.. but still came up with the wrong answer...
can someone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
use conservation of energy... before the cable breaks, the elevator is steady, with a potential energy mgh... after the elevator hit the spring and compressed it, the velocity is also zero, potential energy become 1/2kx^2

mgh=1/2kx^2
x=sqrt(2mgh/k)
 


It seems like you have the right approach to solving this problem, but there may be an error in your calculations or in the numbers you plugged in. Here are a few things to double check:

1. Make sure you are using the correct units for all the values. For example, the mass should be in kilograms and the spring constant should be in Newtons per meter.

2. Check your signs carefully. Since the elevator is initially moving downwards, the initial velocity should be negative and the final velocity should be zero. The work done by gravity and the spring should also have opposite signs.

3. Make sure you are using the correct formula for the work done by the spring. It should be (1/2)kx^2, not (1/2)kx.

4. Double check your calculations or try using a different method to solve the problem. Sometimes a small mistake can lead to a significantly different answer.

If you are still having trouble, it may be helpful to ask a classmate or your instructor for assistance. They may be able to identify where you went wrong or provide additional guidance on how to solve the problem.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top