How Much Energy Is Required to Elevate a Satellite to 1800 km Altitude?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rdn98
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Satellite
AI Thread Summary
To elevate a 1700 kg satellite to an altitude of 1800 km, the energy required includes both potential and kinetic energy. The correct formula for total energy is -GMm/r + 0.5mv^2, where r is the radius of the Earth plus the altitude. However, when calculating energy for reaching altitude alone, kinetic energy for orbital motion should not be included, as the focus is on the energy needed to ascend. The Vis-Viva equation can help determine velocity, but for this scenario, only the potential energy to reach the altitude is relevant. Thus, the energy calculation should exclude kinetic energy associated with orbiting.
rdn98
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
A 1700 kg satellite is orbitting the Earth in a circular orbit with an altitude of 1800 km.

a) How much energy does it take just to get it to this altitude?
.
.
.

Ok, I just need help getting the setup on this first part.

The amount of energy need to get to this altitude would the sum of the initial potential and kinetic energies, right?

So -GMm/r + .5mv^2 = total energy?

where r= Radius of Earth + altiude (m)

I can figure out the velocity using escape velocity equation, but I get this big negative answer. Thats not right, so what's the right way to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by rdn98
So -GMm/r + .5mv^2 = total energy?

This is correct.

where r= Radius of Earth + altiude (m)

I can figure out the velocity using escape velocity equation, but I get this big negative answer. Thats not right, so what's the right way to do this?

By definition, total energy is zero if you are on an escape trajectory. That means that any bound orbit will have a negative energy.

To find the velocity, use the Vis-Viva equation, which relates energy, velocity, semi-major axis and orbital distance (and the escape velocity is drawn from the equation as well)

<br /> <br /> \epsilon = \frac{V^2}{r}-\frac{\mu}{r}=-\frac{\mu}{2a}<br /> <br />

Where \epsilon is total energy
\mu is the gravitational parameter, G*M
r is the distance from the earth
and a is the semi-major axis of the orbit (r for circular, infinity for parabolic or escape velocity)
 
Last edited:
But the original problem said "just to get it to this altitude". My guess would be that you should not take into account the kinetic energy of moving in orbit. "Just to get it to this altitude" would seem to me to be the energy necessary to get up to that altitude, not to be in orbit at that altituded.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top