How Much Energy to Accelerate the ISS to LHC Proton Speeds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cjackson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Lhc
AI Thread Summary
Accelerating a macroscopic object like the ISS to the speeds of protons at the LHC would require an immense amount of energy, approximately 6 x 10^21 J/kg. This translates to about 10 times the annual global energy consumption for each kilogram of mass. The ISS, weighing over 400,000 kg, would thus require energy on an unprecedented scale. The challenge lies in the fact that elementary particles can be easily accelerated due to their significant charge-to-weight ratio, a principle that does not apply to larger objects like the ISS. Achieving such speeds would be extraordinarily difficult, highlighting the limitations of current technology in accelerating large masses to relativistic speeds.
cjackson
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
to accelerate a macroscopic object to the speeds reached by protons at the LHC? want to accelerate an object the size of the ISS to the speed of subatomic particles in a collider. I would like to know how much energy would be required.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cjackson said:
to accelerate a macroscopic object to the speeds reached by protons at the LHC? want to accelerate an object the size of the ISS to the speed of subatomic particles in a collider. I would like to know how much energy would be required.

Why?
 
berkeman said:
Why?
I'm just curious how difficult it would be to accelerate a macroscopic object to speeds were relativistic effects become significant. The ISS is a big object, so I assume making igo as fast as the 'oh my god' particle would be difficult, to say the least.
 
The maximum energy that the LHC can give to a proton is 7TeV, the rest energy of a proton is 0.938 GeV, so you need about 7400 times the rest energy to accelerate something to LHC speed.

This means about 7.4 * (10^3) * c^2 times the mass, so 6*10^21 J/kg. That's about 10 times the yearly world energy consumption for each kg. The ISS weighs more than 4*10^5 kg.

Elementary particles can be accelerated easily in a particle accelerator, because their electric charge is so large compared to their weight. This won't work with macroscopic objects, because they consist of both positive and negative charges, and any charge imbalance has to be tiny, or the charge will just fly off.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top