How Much Ice Melts When Shot with a Lead Bullet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bennigan88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bullet Ice Lead
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the amount of ice melted when a lead bullet, traveling at 240 m/s and initially at 30 °C, impacts ice. The original poster questions the textbook's formula for determining the melting ice, suggesting an alternative method to first calculate the bullet's final temperature after embedding in the ice. They find that their calculations yield an implausible final temperature of 481 °C, leading to a mass change of 0.56 g of melted ice, which they believe is incorrect. Other participants clarify that the textbook's approach is valid, and any discrepancies likely stem from numerical errors in the poster's calculations. The consensus emphasizes that both methods should yield the same result if executed correctly.
Bennigan88
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
I am trying to find the amount of ice that melts when a lead bullet traveling at 240 m/s at 30 °C. This textbook claims I should use the formula
\dfrac{1}{2} m v^2 + m_{bullet} c_{bullet} \left|\Delta \right| T = L_f \Delta m

What I don't understand is why I shouldn't first calculate how hot the bullet gets after embedding into the ice using
\dfrac{1}{2} m v^2 = mc \left( T_f-30^{\circ}C \right)

Then calculate the amount of ice that melts using:
L \Delta m = -m_{bullet} c_{bullet} \left( T_f - T_i \right)
Where Tf is 0°C and Ti is the Tf after the embedding in the ice.

The data is that the mass of the bullet is 3.00g, so (1/2)mv^2 = mc(Tf-Ti) gives a Tf of 481 deg Celsius, which would cause a change in mass (melting of the ice into water) of .56 g but this is incorrect. Can anyone explain why this method is wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Changing the variable names to be consistent, you have:
\dfrac{1}{2} m_b v^2 = m_bc_b \left( T_h-T_{30}\right)
L \Delta m = -m_b c_b \left( T_f - T_h \right)
Subtracting one from the other gives
\dfrac{1}{2} m_b v^2 - L \Delta m = m_bc_b \left( T_f-T_{30}\right)
Rearranging
\dfrac{1}{2} m_b v^2 - m_bc_b \left( T_f-T_{30}\right) = L \Delta m
For the bullet, \Delta T = T_f-T_{30} < 0, so - m_bc_b \left( T_f-T_{30}\right) = - m_bc_b \Delta T = +m_bc_b |\Delta T|
That gives the equation in the book, so you ought to get the same result either way. If you did not then you must have made a numerical error.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top