B How Much Mass Required to Demonstrate Gravity?

AI Thread Summary
To demonstrate gravity independent of Earth's influence, an experiment would need to occur in space with sufficient mass to be observable by the naked eye. A minimum mass comparable to that of a planet is necessary for visibility, as smaller masses would not create a noticeable gravitational pull. Historical methods, like the torsion balance used in the Cavendish experiment, highlight the challenges of measuring gravity accurately. Two 10kg masses, if positioned 1 meter apart and initially at rest, would collide within approximately 8 hours, but achieving such precise initial conditions is complex. Ultimately, demonstrating gravity in this manner requires significant mass and careful arrangement to be effective.
Roman Mithman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If one were to demonstrate gravity independent of earth's constant gravity, how could it be done? Assuming this would need to be done in space, what minimum proportions of mass would be required to demonstrate gravitational pull to a human's naked eye?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two 10kg masses 1m apart in space and initially at rest would collide fairly quickly. Setting ##s=\frac 12\frac{GM}{r^2}t^2## gives an upper bound of about 8 hours (remembering each mass only needs to travel ##s=0.5\mathrm{m}##).

Of course, you need to arrange that the masses are initially stationary to better than 0.01mm/s, which is non trivial.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK, russ_watters and Roman Mithman
If it needs to be in space, far from the earth, and you need to see it with the unaided eye, it needs to be at least planet-sized. (Note that this is independent of measuring gravity)
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Back
Top