How Much Sodium Bicitrate Is Required for a pH 5.42 Solution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jumbogala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acids
AI Thread Summary
To prepare a 1.00 L solution with a pH of 5.42, the concentration of hydronium ions [H3O+] is calculated as 10^-5.42. The discussion highlights confusion regarding sodium bicitrate and its role in the equilibrium expression for its dissociation. Participants express difficulty in determining the necessary mass of sodium bicitrate without understanding its chemical properties. Additionally, the relationship between pH and pOH is mentioned, indicating that pOH can be derived from the pH value. Clarifying these concepts is essential for solving the problem effectively.
jumbogala
Messages
414
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


What mass of sodium bicitrate would be needed to prepare a 1.00 L solution with a pH of 5.42?


Homework Equations


[H30+]=10^-pH


The Attempt at a Solution


First of all, I don't know what sodium bicitrate is, so I can't write the equation for it. What's bicitrate?

I wanted write the equilibrium expression for Ka. But I can only find the concentration of the [H30+] and not anything else... I have no idea how to do this question. Help please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if pH = 5.42, what is pOH equal to?

then [OH-] = 10^-pOH
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top