How Much Water Vapor Is Needed to Heat a Pot from 30C to 60C?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AlexPilk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thermodynamics
AI Thread Summary
To heat 2 kg of water in an aluminum pot from 30°C to 60°C, the heat transfer equations must account for both the water and the pot. The key question is determining the mass of water vapor at 100°C needed for this process, considering the heat released during condensation. The discussion highlights the need to clarify whether the vapor's heat should be calculated based on its condensation to liquid at 100°C or if it can be utilized at a lower temperature. Various interpretations of the problem suggest that the heat from the condensate could be used effectively, but constraints from thermodynamic laws limit how far the temperature can drop. Ultimately, the problem is seen as poorly worded, leading to confusion about the correct approach for calculating the required mass of water vapor.
AlexPilk
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There are 2 kg of water in an aluminium pot at the temperature of 30C. What is the mass of water vapor (100C) needed to heat the pot with water to 60C? Mass of the pot = 0.5kg

m(water)=2kg
m(pot)=0.5kg
T1=30C
T2=60C
c(water)=4200 J/kg*C
c(aluminium)=890 J/kg*C
T(water vapor)=100*C
c(water vapor)= 2020 J/kg*C
m(water vapor)=?

2. The attempt at a solution

Q=Q1+Q2
Q=c(water)*m(water)*(T2-T1)+c(aluminium)*m(aluminium)*(T2-T1)

I supposed that
Q=c(vapor)*m(vapor)*(T2-T(vapor))
But then Q would be less than 0 since the temperature difference is less than 0. What is the right way to write this last equation? And the final equation to find the mass of water vapor?
Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You write Q=c(vapor)*m(vapor)*(T2-T(vapor)), but the formulation says What is the mass of water vapor (100 C), not taking account of the condensation of vapor water. This is, we use m Kg of vapor water to heat up the Al pot, which transfer heat to the water inside it. I'm thinking more of Q=c(vapor)*m(vapor)*(100)

On the other hand, you are supposing that both Al pot and the water inside it will reach the same temperature (T2). That would be the case according to zeroth law of thermodynamics, in thermal equilibrium (for large t, time). One could put it like: 1) Final T2 in the pot for the water to reach 60c? and 2) mass of vapor water to heat the pot to that T2 calculated in 1. This is my guess...
 
At best, this is a poorly (imprecisely) worded problem. I think what they are asking is how much water vapor has to condense from vapor to liquid water at 100 C to supply the heat required to heat up the pot and its contents to 60C. So, how much heat does it take to heat up the contents?

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
At best, this is a poorly (imprecisely) worded problem. I think what they are asking is how much water vapor has to condense from vapor to liquid water at 100 C to supply the heat required to heat up the pot and its contents to 60C. So, how much heat does it take to heat up the contents?

Chet
Maybe, but there are at least two other reasonable interpretations. There is still useful heat available in condensate at 100C, so could take everyting as finishing at 60C. Better still, the initial condensate is useful down to almost 30C, so the minimum vapor required is less again.
 
haruspex said:
Maybe, but there are at least two other reasonable interpretations. There is still useful heat available in condensate at 100C, so could take everyting as finishing at 60C. Better still, the initial condensate is useful down to almost 30C, so the minimum vapor required is less again.
Yes. I too thought about the possibility of taking the condensate down to 60, and this is certainly also a valid interpretation. As far as taking the condensate all the way down to 30, it doesn't seem like this can be done because of 2nd law constraints. Can you think of a way?

Chet
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top