How much work does a crane and gravity do on a large box?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the work done by a crane and gravity on a large box, highlighting the confusion around the forces involved. The crane is said to do mgh of work while gravity does -mgh, but the tension in the string must exceed gravity for the box to move upwards, even if only briefly. It's clarified that the box can be lifted at constant velocity, meaning acceleration is zero, which does not imply the box is stationary. The net work done on the box is related to its change in kinetic energy, and while the crane does work against gravity, it may not contribute to the box's kinetic energy if lifted slowly. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the nuances of force, work, and motion in this context.
Warlic
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


upload_2015-11-30_11-38-45.png
[/B]

Homework Equations


E(p)=mgh
W = Fs

3. The Attempt at a Solution

The book says the crane does mgh amount of work, while gravity does -mgh.
What I don't understand is, for the box to be lifted up, doesn't string tension force have to be bigger than gravity - or else it would remain in place and not accelerate upwards? If so, formula for work is W=Fs, the distance s is same for both forces, but string tension force is bigger, so doesn't crane do more absolute work on the box that gravity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Warlic said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 92644[/B]

Homework Equations


E(p)=mgh
W = Fs

3. The Attempt at a Solution

The book says the crane does mgh amount of work, while gravity does -mgh.
What I don't understand is, for the box to be lifted up, doesn't string tension force have to be bigger than gravity - or else it would remain in place and not accelerate upwards? If so, formula for work is W=Fs, the distance s is same for both forces, but string tension force is bigger, so doesn't crane do more absolute work on the box that gravity?
Who says that the box is accelerating upwards? You can lift things perfectly well at constant velocity.

You're making the mistake by assuming that if acceleration = 0, then velocity = 0. If something has zero acceleration, it could be stationary or moving at constant velocity. You can't tell which situation applies unless you are given more information. In this case, the crane is 'slowly lifting' the box, which implies that velocity is not zero.
 
  • Like
Likes Warlic
SteamKing said:
Who says that the box is accelerating upwards? You can lift things perfectly well at constant velocity.

You're making the mistake by assuming that if acceleration = 0, then velocity = 0. If something has zero acceleration, it could be stationary or moving at constant velocity. You can't tell which situation applies unless you are given more information. In this case, the crane is 'slowly lifting' the box, which implies that velocity is not zero.
Thank you, now I feel stupid.
 
Warlic said:
Thank you, now I feel stupid.
You shouldn't. You are quite right that the tension had to exceed mg at some point, but perhaps only by the tiniest amount, and for the briefest period. Once the box is in motion, the tension can drop back to equal mgh until the box is at the desired height. It might just take a while.

By the way, as I understand it, the book should not insist the crane did mgh of work on the box. It did mgh of work, but the net work done on an object is its increase in KE. If you throw a ball up with enough speed to reach height h then you do mgh work on the ball, then the ball does that same work against gravity (i.e. it does that work on the ball-Earth system). But if the crane lifts the mass slowly and steadily to a height h, you could equally say the crane did mgh work against gravity and none on the box.
 
  • Like
Likes nrqed and Warlic
Why crane booms are made up of rectangular cross sections instead of circular section?
 
Manimech said:
Why crane booms are made up of rectangular cross sections instead of circular section?
Probably because they are easier to make.
If you wish to pursue this question, please create a new thread, not in a homework forum.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top