Chemistry How Much X Will React in a Variable Mole Reaction? X + 5Y > 3Z | Homework Help"

AI Thread Summary
In the reaction X + 5Y > 3Z, the problem involves 3 moles of X and 2.8 moles of Y. To determine how much X will react, it's essential to identify the limiting reactant. The stoichiometry indicates that 5 moles of Y are required for every mole of X, meaning that with only 2.8 moles of Y available, Y is the limiting reactant. Consequently, the amount of X that will actually react is based on the available Y, leading to the conclusion that not all of the 3 moles of X will be consumed. Understanding the limiting reactant is crucial for solving stoichiometry problems effectively.
triplepie
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



3 moles of X and 2.8 moles of Y are allowed to react. How much X will actually react?

X + 5Y > 3Z

Homework Equations



Not sure


The Attempt at a Solution



Not sure
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think its 1 mole but not sure.
 
This is merely a stoiciometry exercise, somewhat generalized. Find which reactant is the limiting reactant; that determines how much of the other reactant will be consumed.

The written reaction shows 1 mole of X; the situation uses 3 moles of X.
The written reaction shows 5 moles of Y; the situation uses 2.8 moles of Y.
Either X or Y is likely to be in excess. Which one? The other is then the limiting reactant.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Chemistry Solving Al + BaNO3 Reactions for N2 Volume
Replies
3
Views
16K
Chemistry How do you calculate moles to neutralise oxalic acid?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Ammonia and Oxygen Reaction: How Many Moles of NO?
Replies
3
Views
10K
Chemistry How to find moles of O in CO molecule?
Replies
21
Views
3K
Percent yield/excess reactant problem
Replies
1
Views
2K
Chemistry Does hydrated Copper Chloride with 20 moles of H2O make sense?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Chemistry How to get moles from MO having % of mass?
Replies
25
Views
3K
Chemistry Relation between mole, volume and pressure fraction
Replies
5
Views
4K
Chemistry How to get the atomic weight of O 16g/mole to amu?
Replies
10
Views
3K
Solving Volumetric Analysis Questions with NaOH & H3PO4
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top