How Practical Is Calculating Feynman Propagators for Quantum Oscillators?

rishi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am pretty new to the subject and hope someone can give me certain links to start off.

We can express the time evolutions of a quantum mechanical state of a system as :
|psi(Xf,T)> = Gv(Xf,T;X0,0) |psi(X0,0)>

Now Gv can be expressed as a discretized Feynman Path integral which comes out to be a pretty complex integral (equation 4 in attached file). I am unable to understand as to how should I code a program to calulate this integral. any ideas!
 

Attachments

  • eqn-4.gif
    eqn-4.gif
    2.1 KB · Views: 674
Physics news on Phys.org
An excellent exposition of path integrals is available in Anthony Zee's book, Qyuantum Field Theory in a Nutshell.
 
I would suggest looking up Monte Carlo integration in a computational physics book, for example, Rubin Landau's or David Cook's.
 
some solution but...

I found an easy approach to calulate the Feynman propogator using Feynman path integral approach. Interested users can refer to paper titled:

"Three Methods for calculating the Feynman Propogator" by
F.A.Barone

However I now have one question. In this paper the feynman path was calulated using lagrangian for a quantum oscillator. Could anyone tell me how practical can this turn out to be. For e.g. can we make measurements of a state of a quantum oscillator. If we can then I think we should be able to use this approach to predict the output or make some sort of quantum gates. I haven't fully formalise if anything like this is possible. Maybe someone can tell me if this can be feasible at all or am I missing out some crucial point.

TIA
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top