How Should Relative Permittivity Be Applied in Electric Field Calculations?

AI Thread Summary
In calculating electric field strength between two charges in a medium with relative permittivity of 5.5, it is essential to multiply the permittivity of free space (εo) by the relative permittivity (εr). The combined permittivity can be expressed as ε = εo * εr, which is crucial for accurate calculations. Confusion arises from varying representations of the formula across different sources, but the relationship between εo and εr remains consistent. Understanding this relationship ensures correct application in electric field calculations. Properly applying these values leads to more reliable results in physics problems involving electric fields.
Jmphysics
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I've been given a question where I have to find the electric field strength at a point between two charges. Now I understand the mathematics but the question I'm trying to solve says two point charges of value 2C and 3C are position within a medium of relative permittivity 5.5.

My question is when i put my values into the electric field strength equation should this value 5.5 be multiply by the permittivity of free space or be used differently.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I have looked on the internet for the formula but sometimes its written differently and I just want to be one hundred percent confident I'm using this value correctly since I keep finding conflicting information.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is strange that it's worded like that, but my guess is that you multiply the permittivity of free space by 5.5
 
Hi Jmphysics.
2d4066413017023.gif


εo and εr always go around together like a married couple; where you find one it needs the other right alongside.

Some formulae emphasise this by explicitly showing their product εoεr, other formulae denote this product concisely as just ε
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top