How Significant Is Power Loss at Electrical Junctions with Movable Parts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jarfi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Loss Power
AI Thread Summary
Power loss at electrical junctions with movable parts, such as brushes, is a concern for applications like electric brushless motors. While brushed motors demonstrate that voltage drop can be manageable, the design must consider the trade-offs between size and efficiency. Using carbon or graphite brushes may introduce reliability issues and bulkiness compared to alternatives like flexible conductors or coils. It is recommended to avoid passing current through metal bearings and to explore options like brass shim strips for power delivery. Ultimately, the choice between a brushed solution and a flexible conductor hinges on balancing power loss, space constraints, and engineering challenges.
Jarfi
Messages
384
Reaction score
12
Good day. I was wondering what the extent of resistance/voltage drop occurs over junctions that are made off movable parts and brushes. Electrical trains tend to get the voltage from brushes so it can't be too great, also brushed motors.

In my case I was planning to run an electric brushless motor, but it is situated on a moving part, so either it was making long wires that can bend and twist a little, but that takes some space which would make my mechatronic machine larger. But then ofcourse I figured a simple coal brush or whatever like they use in brushed motors, and since this moving part will be moving far less, slower then in a brushed motor, it should last, my only concern left was weather there was a great amount of power loss in the junction between the brush and the moving part.

I made a quick sketch of the concept, the moving part moves +/- 30 deg, around an axis.
 

Attachments

  • brush.JPG
    brush.JPG
    21.1 KB · Views: 471
Engineering news on Phys.org
Assuming you don't get arcs, it is just a regular resistor: P=I^2*R
Lower currents (and therefore higher voltages for the same power) are better, but can lead to problems elsewhere.
 
A carbon / graphite brush will be less reliable and more bulky than a coil shaped like the hair springs in a meter.
You can wind say a two turn coil of metal tape to carry power to the moving part.
I would consider cutting strips of 0.010” brass shim from a model shop. Size will depend on power.
Avoid passing current through metal bearings. It is better to use an extra flexible conductor.
 
Baluncore said:
A carbon / graphite brush will be less reliable and more bulky than a coil shaped like the hair springs in a meter.
You can wind say a two turn coil of metal tape to carry power to the moving part.
I would consider cutting strips of 0.010” brass shim from a model shop. Size will depend on power.
Avoid passing current through metal bearings. It is better to use an extra flexible conductor.

Thanks for the input,

I tried to get a mental picture of this but couldn't with my current education. Is there a name for what you are mentioning? Id gladly study a better solution than a carbon brush.

Also, a flexible conductor is a possibility, that is how the original concept was. I then recently have been leaning over to brushes due to advantages on size, a brushed solution takes less space then a flexing wire, my original concept had empty spaces for wires to move around in.

Brushed solution: possible power loss but less spacious

Flexing wire solution: efficient but space and engineering difficulties.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top