How small for perturbation theory to be valid?

czaroffishies
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of mass m is in the ground state in the harmonic oscillator potential

V(x) = \frac{1}{2}Kx^{2}

A small perturbation \beta x^{6} is added to this potential.

How small must \beta be in order for perturbation theory to be valid?

Homework Equations



All here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pertur...chanics)#Time-independent_perturbation_theory

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, this is kind of a conceptual question, and I'm not sure how to start. It feels like I am guessing.

All I know is that:

\beta x^{6} << \frac{1}{2}Kx^{2}

I would really appreciate a pointer in the right direction... thanks =)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
czaroffishies said:

Homework Statement



A particle of mass m is in the ground state in the harmonic oscillator potential

V(x) = \frac{1}{2}Kx^{2}

A small perturbation \beta x^{6} is added to this potential.

How small must \beta be in order for perturbation theory to be valid?

Homework Equations



All here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pertur...chanics)#Time-independent_perturbation_theory

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, this is kind of a conceptual question, and I'm not sure how to start. It feels like I am guessing.

All I know is that:

\beta x^{6} << \frac{1}{2}Kx^{2}

I would really appreciate a pointer in the right direction... thanks =)

Well, these are operators so it is not well-defined to write an inequality between operators.
What you must do is impose that the first order correction to the energy due to the perturbation must much smaller than the unperturbed energies.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top