How surface tension is measured for molten metals?

AI Thread Summary
Surface tension measurement for molten metals can be conducted using various methods, including the pendant-drop approach, maximum bubble pressure method, and electrostatic levitation of oscillating droplets. The pendant-drop method is noted for its inaccuracies, while the maximum bubble pressure method is favored for Earth-based studies of reactive substances. The oscillating droplet method in microgravity serves as a verification technique against electromagnetic field influences. A historical approach involved curve fitting to analyze the shape of sessile drops, yielding acceptable precision in results. Overall, the discussion highlights the need for accurate methods in measuring surface tension for molten metals.
ORF
Messages
169
Reaction score
18
Hello

How the surface tension is measured for molten metals? I have heard about the sessile drop, but it seems to be a very inaccurate method...

Thank you for your time.

Regards.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Experimentalists have also looked at the size of a drop as it falls (e.g., the pendant-drop approach, J Tille and J C Kelly 1963 Br. J. Appl. Phys. 14 717), the maximum bubble pressure method, electrostatic levitation of oscillating droplets, and characterization of oscillating droplets in microgravity (I Egry, G Lohoefer, and G Jacobs 1995 Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4043). The penultimate method seems to be the consensus for Earth-based characterization of the surface tension of molten metals and strongly reactive substances. The final method provides a check against the methods used to correct for the influence of the strong EM field required for levitation.
 
ORF said:
I have heard about the sessile drop, but it seems to be a very inaccurate method...
Hi ORF:

A long time ago I was involved in helping a physical chemist friend determine surface tension of mercury drops by developing a method of calculating the best fitting mathematical shape of a sessile drop to a set of observed shape measurements. As I remember, the paper that resulted reported an acceptable level of precision in he results.
"A curve fitting method for calculating interfacial tension from the shape of a sessile drop" James N. Butler and Burton H. Bloom, Surface Science 4 (1966) 1-17.​

Why do you think this method is inaccurate?

Regards,
Buzz
 
Back
Top