How the angle of launch affect the range?

AI Thread Summary
The experiment aims to investigate how the angle of launch affects the range of a rubber band. Consideration of drag force is suggested, although modeling it may be complex and more suitable for measurement rather than analysis. Using a slingshot mechanism to launch a small object like a marble is recommended for more consistent and analyzable results. The discussion emphasizes the importance of measuring both range and launch angle to validate predictions from equations. Overall, the focus is on ensuring the experiment is manageable and yields meaningful data.
rasalzari
Messages
27
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I'm about to conduct an experiment about factors that affect the flight of an elastic band.
The aim of this experiment is to find how the angle of launch, when shooting a rubber band, affects the range or distance of the shot.
Do you suggest to consider the drag force? like, for example, show the differences on how with and without air resistance the range is affected?

Variable list:
  • Independent Variable
    • Angle of launch
  • Dependent Variable
    • Range or distance

Homework Equations


Without air resistance these formulas are applicable:
range_equation_initial_velocity.png
range_equation_gravity.png
vertical_velocity_equation_time.png

More examples of equations

With air resistance:
https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/144ce01ab76e5e8a0662dbf0f5b922abfa726e9c

The Attempt at a Solution


Like I said I will be doing a lab report, so I thought of considering the drag force but I don't know much about it, however, do you think its a good idea to show the difference? or should I show the difference in vertical height?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does it have to be an elastic band that you launch? If not, consider using an elastic band to launch something else, like a marble or ball bearing. I suggest that would give you much more analyzable and repeatable results. Launching an elastic band repeatably might be a challenge, and modelling it would certainly be. Setting up a slingshot sort of launch mechanism seems more straightforward and amenable to modelling with basic equations you can learn to apply without yet knowing calculus. You can ignore the effects of drag on a small spherical object and clearly see that the range you predict for different launch angles matches pretty well with your equations, if you have properly calibrated the energy in the stretched elastic launcher.

To model drag on an elastic band would require pretty advanced techniques, imo so elaborate that most would consider it a measurement problem, not an analysis problem (meaning its too much trouble to calculate it, just measure it).
 
Grinkle said:
Does it have to be an elastic band that you launch? If not, consider using an elastic band to launch something else, like a marble or ball bearing. I suggest that would give you much more analyzable and repeatable results. Launching an elastic band repeatably might be a challenge, and modelling it would certainly be. Setting up a slingshot sort of launch mechanism seems more straightforward and amenable to modelling with basic equations you can learn to apply without yet knowing calculus. You can ignore the effects of drag on a small spherical object and clearly see that the range you predict for different launch angles matches pretty well with your equations, if you have properly calibrated the energy in the stretched elastic launcher.

To model drag on an elastic band would require pretty advanced techniques, imo so elaborate that most would consider it a measurement problem, not an analysis problem (meaning its too much trouble to calculate it, just measure it).
Alright then i will be measuring the highest peak, max height, time taken, velocities and graph the results. Do you think this will be enough?
 
rasalzari said:
highest peak, max height

What is the difference between those two?

rasalzari said:
velocities
Out of curiosity, how will you measure this?

rasalzari said:
Do you think this will be enough?
If your goal is to test specific calculations you make that predict things like max height and compare them to experimental results, then you should look at the equations you plan to use and decide which of the results of your equations you are able to measure to assess if its enough to make a good experiment. One comment I have is that you started out stating you want to measure range vs launch angle, so I would expect to see both of those things in your list.
 
I am not sure what level of education you are at or how much effort is expected from you in this exercise. It may be that I am putting you in over your head with some of my suggestions - if it feels that way, below is a link to a very simple experiment using only rubber bands that will let you explore most of the concepts you are talking about.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/bring-science-home-rubber-bands-energy/

edit: I just saw your other thread on the same topic. Probably best to keep all the discussion in one thread.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top