How the inner product changes under non-linear transformation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the behavior of the inner product under non-linear transformations, specifically when using a diffeomorphism. It establishes that while the inner product of transformed vectors can be defined for linear functions, the situation becomes complex with non-linear mappings. The Jacobian of the diffeomorphism plays a crucial role, as it varies with position on the manifold, indicating that the transformation law does not apply uniformly to positions. The conversation highlights the need for a deeper understanding of manifolds and their properties in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces, specifically ℝn
  • Knowledge of linear functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with inner product definitions and adjoint operators
  • Basic concepts of differential geometry, particularly diffeomorphisms and Jacobians
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inner products in non-linear transformations
  • Learn about the role of Jacobians in diffeomorphisms
  • Explore differential geometry and its applications in manifold theory
  • Investigate the relationship between linear and non-linear mappings in vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying advanced calculus or differential geometry, particularly those interested in the implications of non-linear transformations on vector spaces.

mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hi,

if we suppose x and y are two elements of some vector space V (say ℝn), and if we consider a linear function f:V→V', we know that the inner product of the transformed vectors is given by: \left\langle f\mathbf{x} , f\mathbf{y} \right\rangle = \left\langle \mathbf{x} , \overline{f}f\mathbf{y} \right\rangle = \left\langle \overline{f}f\mathbf{x} , \mathbf{y} \right\rangle where \overline{f} is the adjoint operator of f.

What can we say about \left\langle f\mathbf{x} , f\mathbf{y} \right\rangle when f is non-linear, for example a diffeomorphism ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I admit I'm not well versed in stuff with manifolds and such, but isn't a diffeomorphism basically a way of mapping positions on one manifold to positions on another? If so, then ##f## is just the Jacobian of the mapping, and it is inherently dependent on position within the manifold. It's important to note that positions won't obey this transformation law, only the full, nonlinear transformation.
 
Hi Muphrid,
thanks for the answer. That's exactly what I wanted to know.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
684
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K