I How thick does a material have to be to start to become opaq

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nicholas Lee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Material
Nicholas Lee
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
-que to light?Someone said a atom is transparent to light to me.
but as a material get more thicker, either in single atoms, or a micron, electrons start to absorb light, and there is no more transparency
How thick does a material have to be before there is no more transparency.
Like the material acts as a wall to light.
Now solid state physics can be VERY DIFFERENT than atomic physics.
When atoms are joined together to form a solid, their behavior can be very different than when they are isolated. There are no more "discrete energy states" at the low-lying range, because these have been replaced by energy BANDS!.
If I take carbon atoms, and arrange it in one way, I get graphite.
But I change the arrangement in another way, I get diamond!
Two completely different types of material, and with different optical properties.
Yet, each one of them is made of carbon.
Thank you for your help, anything helps,even a few words.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gold need only be a couple of atoms thick to be opaque.
Water needs to be many tens of metres thick to be opaque.
 
  • Like
Likes Nicholas Lee
DaveC426913 said:
Gold need only be a couple of atoms thick to be opaque.
Water needs to be many tens of metres thick to be opaque.
Thank you
 
DaveC426913 said:
Gold need only be a couple of atoms thick to be opaque.
Water needs to be many tens of metres thick to be opaque.
Great thank you.
 
Nicholas Lee said:
-que to light?Someone said a atom is transparent to light to me.
but as a material get more thicker, either in single atoms, or a micron, electrons start to absorb light, and there is no more transparency
How thick does a material have to be before there is no more transparency.
Like the material acts as a wall to light.
Now solid state physics can be VERY DIFFERENT than atomic physics.
When atoms are joined together to form a solid, their behavior can be very different than when they are isolated. There are no more "discrete energy states" at the low-lying range, because these have been replaced by energy BANDS!.
If I take carbon atoms, and arrange it in one way, I get graphite.
But I change the arrangement in another way, I get diamond!
Two completely different types of material, and with different optical properties.
Yet, each one of them is made of carbon.
Thank you for your help, anything helps,even a few words.

Are you aware that you plagiarized one of my posts?

If you are CITING someone, either use the QUOTE function, or quote what you are copying in " ". Otherwise, this looks as if this was ALL written by you!

And why are you starting a new thread, rather than asking this as a follow-up to the thread that had this passage that you copied? You have started numerous threads on almost the SAME topic.

Zz.
 
Last edited:
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top