How to Adjust Piano String Tension for Optimal Frequency | Piano Tuning Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phymath
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To adjust the piano string tension for the correct frequency of middle C, which is 261.6 Hz, the original tension of 754 N needs to be recalculated based on the frequency difference of 12.6 Hz. The discussion highlights the use of formulas relating tension and frequency, specifically v = √(T/μ) and v = λf, but lacks specific values for density (μ) and wave velocity. Participants suggest that the problem can be approached through proportionality, using known values to derive the necessary tension adjustment. Additionally, a related problem involving two materials with different mass per unit lengths is also discussed, indicating a potential proportionality relationship for wavelength. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity on the variables involved to solve these tuning and wavelength problems effectively.
Phymath
Messages
183
Reaction score
0
well here's the problem: A piano tuner detects that the "middle C" note, which should be 261.6 Hz, is too low by 12.6 Hz. If the original tension was 754 N, what must it be adjsuted to so the note plays the correct frequency?

however i have no idea where to even start?! i got these formulas but i was never given a 4th value like the density (mu) or the velocity of the note in the wire where to go!

v = \sqrt{\frac{T}{\mu}}
v = \lambda f = \frac{\lambda}{t} where t is the period, and T is the tension in the string

as well as this one.. i think its a porportionalitly question I am not sure though please help me even get started

A string is made of two materials of different mass per unit length, 2.31 g/m on the left and 3.25 g/m on the right, connected together at the center. If the wavelength of the wave on the left segment is 21.7 m, what is the wavelength on the right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Phymath said:
i think its a porportionalitly question I am not sure though

I'll take a crack at the first problem...I’ve got a bit of a cold, but I think your right. The first question is a proportionality question. If you know that T1=754N and F1=261.6Hz then perhaps an equality would solve this one, you already know what F2 is, now all you need is to solve for T1.

Merle
 
agreed as possibly the last problem is the same, however these problems are typically not like that but ill give it a shot thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top