How to Approach a Three-Dimensional Force System with a Corner Joint?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mneox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Systems
mneox
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/3496/71042279.jpg

Homework Equations



F = Fu

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, so um I'm having trouble with this particular question. Normally if the wires were all straight, I'd have no problem solving this. But for this question, the wire seems to go from B to A to C, creating this corner/joint looking thing.

How do I solve with this thing? Kind of confused how I can utilize the angles as well... thanks the help in advance. I don't need answers or anything, but I just need a push to get started. The CAB corner joint thing is really throwing me off here. Not sure how to proceed.

Thanks again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi mneox! :smile:
mneox said:
Okay, so um I'm having trouble with this particular question. Normally if the wires were all straight, I'd have no problem solving this. But for this question, the wire seems to go from B to A to C, creating this corner/joint looking thing.

the weight at A is in equlibrium, so that gives you an equation relating the tensions in AB and AC :wink:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top