How to Calculate Expectation Value of Product State in a Potential-Free System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lindsayyyy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product States
Lindsayyyy
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone

Homework Statement



I have to particles without a potential. The coordinates are r_1 and r_2 (for particle 1 and 2). Both have orthonormal states |↑> and |↓>. I shall show that the expectation value is the following, where as |↑↓> is a product state

d^2=\langle \uparrow \downarrow \mid (r_1-r_2)^2 \mid \uparrow \downarrow \rangle = \langle \uparrow \mid r^2 \mid \uparrow\rangle +\langle \downarrow \mid r^2 \mid \downarrow \rangle -2 \langle \uparrow \mid \vec r \mid \uparrow \rangle \langle \downarrow \mid \vec r \mid \downarrow \rangle



Homework Equations



-

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, my attempt so far isn't very good I think because I have many problems understanding this.

I think I can write my r_1 as:

\vec r_1 = \frac {1}{\sqrt 2} (\mid \uparrow \rangle + \mid \downarrow \rangle)
and the 2nd one as

\vec r_2 = \frac {1}{\sqrt 2} (\mid \uparrow \rangle + \mid \downarrow \rangle)

I can now to the tensor product, but that doesn't lead to anywhere ( I tried to use it to get my up down product state, but this term looks so complicated I can't use it to ease up my euqations)

Thanks for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically, the tensor product is simply a product of two separate subspaces. So,
\mid \uparrow \downarrow \rangle can be more explicitly written as \mid \uparrow \rangle_{1}\mid\downarrow \rangle_{2}

Furthermore, r_{1} and r_{2} are really r \otimes I and I \otimes r respectively.

You just have to expand (r_1 - r_2)^2 and then "act them" on the appropriate subspaces.
 
thanks for your help so far.

yeah I know that (r1-r2)^2 is on of the binomial theorems. But I don't know actually how, let's say (r_1)^2 acts on ∣↑↓⟩. That's where I'm stuck.

edit: actually, I don't know what r even is (without the index). I thought it might have been a typing mistake by the task given, but you posted it aswell. Or did they just leave out the indices?
 
Lindsayyyy said:
edit: actually, I don't know what r even is (without the index). I thought it might have been a typing mistake by the task given, but you posted it aswell. Or did they just leave out the indices?
My best guess is what I posted earlier: r_{1} = r \otimes I and r_{2} = I \otimes r where I is identity. The subscripts 1 and 2 refer to the particle number.

Let me work out the trickier part explicitly: r_{1}r_{2} = r \otimes r
Lets act it on the state:
(\langle \uparrow \mid \otimes \langle \downarrow \mid)(r \otimes r)(\mid \uparrow \rangle \otimes \mid \downarrow \rangle)
Now, operations on each subspace are independent of each other ie.
(A \otimes B) (C \otimes D) = AC \otimes BD
So, the previous expression simplifies to
(\langle \uparrow \mid r \mid \uparrow \rangle) \otimes (\langle \downarrow \mid r \mid \downarrow \rangle)
But these are just c-numbers. So the tensor product becomes a normal product and we arrive at
\langle \uparrow \mid r \mid \uparrow \rangle\langle \downarrow \mid r \mid \downarrow \rangle
 
thanks for your help. I'm back home tomorrow then I will try to understand it a bit better. If I have problems again I will post here.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top