How to calculate resistivity of coaxial cylinder

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the resistance of a coaxial cylinder composed of a copper core and an aluminum coating. Participants clarify that the resistances of the core and the shield should be treated as parallel, not series, since they conduct current simultaneously. The correct approach involves calculating the individual resistances of both materials and using the formula for resistors in parallel to find the total resistance. Misunderstandings arise regarding the definitions of resistance and resistivity, with emphasis placed on the need to focus on resistance in this context. Overall, the calculation method for the coaxial cylinder's resistance is simplified through proper understanding of the circuit configuration.
jacobier
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Is it any model on resisivity of two tightly-attached coaxial cylinder? For example, a copper core wire is coated with layer of aluminum. How to calculate the final resistivity along axis?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a method on this but that's related to the radial resistance ( the insulator is consider imperfect).

The resistance along axis seems much simpler to me. Just plug in the cross-sectional area, length and conductivity of both the core and the shield in the related formula ( R=\frac{l}{σS}), and add together the resistance of the core and the shield. Hopefully I'm not missing something!
 
Hassan2 said:
add together the resistance of the core and the shield.

I don't think you mean add the resistances together. These are in parallel here, so it's the conductances that add.

Btw, in the OP, you mean resistance, not resistivity. Resistivity is a property of the material, independent of shape and size.
 
Thank you very much. Actually I mean "resistance". I have been looking for solution for this for a long time. Probably the problem is not as complicated as I thought, no one have interest to talked about that.
 
haruspex said:
I don't think you mean add the resistances together. These are in parallel here, so it's the conductances that add.

Actually what I had in mind is that the two , with a load connected to the end form a series circuit, that's why i added the " resistances" together. (OP asked about resistance along the axis.)
 
Hassan2 said:
Actually what I had in mind is that the two , with a load connected to the end form a series circuit, that's why i added the " resistances" together. (OP asked about resistance along the axis.)
I get the feeling you have the wrong model for the set-up. There's a copper core and an Al coating. The axial current will consist of some current in each, in parallel. At each end there may be some radial flow, but I'm assuming we can ignore that.
 
Haruspex is correct that the conductances add. To do it with resistance instead, separately calculate the resistance of a length of the copper core and the same length of hollow Al tube. The total resistance is the parallel combination of the two, using the usual formula for resistors in parallel.
 
marcusl and haruspex,

In the attached figure, aren't the series resistances of the core and the shield added together to give the cable resistance? Sorry I understand that this is very simple question but I would like to know what I am not getting.

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • coax.jpg
    coax.jpg
    7.7 KB · Views: 474
Last edited:
  • #10
Ah - it was me that had the wrong set-up in mind. Yes, they're in series.
 
  • #11
Hassan2 said:
marcusl and haruspex,

In the attached figure, aren't the series resistances of the core and the shield added together to give the cable resistance? Sorry I understand that this is very simple question but I would like to know what I am not getting.

Thanks.

But this is a coaxial cable and not what is described in the OP.
The copper core is not "coated with layer of aluminum" but they are separated by insulator. The OP describes a two tightly attached coaxial cylinders.
 
  • #12
You are right nasu. I got it wrong from the beginning. They are parallel then. Many thanks.
 
Back
Top