How to Calculate Speed and Time for Pions and Spacecraft?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jlmac2001
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Couple
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the speed of a beam of pions, the average lifetime at high speed (4.34×10^-8s) is divided by the rest lifetime (2.60×10^-8s), resulting in a speed of approximately 0.599c. For a spacecraft traveling at 0.910c to a star 70.6 light-years away, the time measured by Earth observers is calculated using the formula time = distance/speed, yielding about 77.5 years. Observers on the spacecraft experience time dilation, leading to a different time calculation using the formula t' = t/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2), resulting in approximately 168.1 years. Both observers ultimately measure the same time for the spacecraft's journey, highlighting the effects of relativity. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurate calculations in relativistic physics.
jlmac2001
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
1. What is the speed of a beam of pions if their average lifetime is measured to be 4.34×10-8s? At rest, their lifetime is 2.60×10-8s.

- Would I use velocity= distance/time? 4.34/2.6=velocity

2. A certain star is 70.6 light-years away. How many years would it take a spacecraft traveling 0.910c to reach that star from Earth, as measured by observers on Earth? How many years would it take to reach that star from Earth, as measured by observers on the spacecraft ?

- For the first part, would it be 70.6/sqrt(1-.910)?
-For the second part, would it be the answer from part 1 divided by sqrt(1-.910)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I hate to say it but you need serious help:
"Would I use velocity= distance/time? 4.34/2.6=velocity"
4.34 is given as the "lifetime"- it is time not distance!
You seem to be just grabbing the two numbers and putting them together is the simplest way. Considering that in order to do this problem you have to be studying relativity, you will need to be able to actually understand things better than that!
If something has a longer lifetime (4.34 is longer than 2.6) at higher speed, it has to be "living" slower. Do you know anything about speed causing time to slow down?

Looking at your remarks about problem two, I'm a little more reassured. Since the Earth is not moving, the time required from the Earth viewpoint for the rocket (at .91c) to go a distance 70.6 light year is just the usual formula: speed= distance/time so time= distance/speed: 70.6/0.91 years (since a "light year" is defined as the distance light goes in a year, we don't have to worry about "c").

From the point of view of the people in the rocket (and since both distance and speed given are measured relative to the earth), we have to allow for the "slowing" of time: but the formula would be 1/(1- 0.91^2).
 



1. Yes, you would use the formula velocity = distance/time. However, in this case, the distance is not given. Instead, you need to use the fact that the average lifetime of the pions is equal to the distance traveled at the speed of light. So, the velocity would be 2.6/4.34 = 0.599c.

2. For the first part, you are correct. The formula for time dilation is t' = t/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2), where t is the time measured by the observer on Earth and t' is the time measured by the spacecraft. So, in this case, t' = 70.6/sqrt(1-0.910^2) = 70.6/0.420 = 168.1 years.

For the second part, you would use the same formula, but with the velocity of the spacecraft (0.910c) instead of the Earth observer (0.599c). So, t' = 70.6/sqrt(1-0.910^2) = 70.6/0.420 = 168.1 years. This means that both observers would measure the same amount of time for the spacecraft to reach the star.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top