How to calculate the comet's speed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jkh4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the speed of Comet Halley as it crosses Neptune's orbit, the conservation of energy equation K2 + U2 = K1 + U1 is applied, where the mass of the comet is not necessary for the calculation. The mass used in the potential energy terms is the mass of the sun, as the comet orbits around it. Kepler's laws can help determine the mass of the sun, but the mass of Neptune is irrelevant in this context. The discussion emphasizes that for similar orbital problems, the mass involved will typically be that of the central body, which is the sun in this case. Understanding these principles allows for accurate calculations of celestial object speeds in elliptical orbits.
jkh4
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Comet moves around the sun in a very ellipical orbit around the sun. As it approach, in 1986, Comet Halley was 8.79x10^7km from the sun and moving with a speed of 54.6km/s. What will be the comet's speed be when it crosses Neptune's orbit in 2006?

length of comet from the sun = 8.79x10^7km = 8.79x10^10 m
v of comet = 54.6km/s = 54.6x10^3m/s
T = 20 years
length of neptune from the sun = 4.50x10^12m


Homework Equations



i use the equation T^2 = (4*pie*r^3)/GM and K2 + U2 = K1 + U1

The Attempt at a Solution


i first use the Kelper's rule to find M of the comet, but i don't really know if that's the right step to start with.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Make the substitutions in your conservation of energy equation and see if you really need to know the mass of the comet.
 
one question, when we calculate with the K2 + U2 = K1 + U1, the M we are using, is that the mass of the sun or neptune?
 
jkh4 said:
one question, when we calculate with the K2 + U2 = K1 + U1, the M we are using, is that the mass of the sun or neptune?

The mass of Neptune does not matter. You are just using the radius of the Neptune orbit as a distance from the sun. The potential energy terms depend on the mass of the sun and the mass of the comet.
 
i got the answer, thank you so much!

btw, so does that mean if for similar questions, the M is always M of sun?
 
Last edited:
jkh4 said:
i got the answer, thank you so much!

btw, so does that mean if for similar questions, the M is always M of sun?

If the orbit is an orbit around the sun, then the mass of the sun is involved. There are many problems involving orbits around other force centers, so M will not always be the sun's mass.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
307
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top