How to Calculate the Percentage Composition of a Compound?

  • Thread starter Thread starter donniemsb_12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hi
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the percentage composition of a compound, the total mass of each element must be determined. In this case, the sample contains 0.09 g of carbon (C), 0.1264 g of oxygen (O), and 0.0158 g of hydrogen (H). The total mass of the sample is the sum of these masses. However, there is uncertainty regarding whether the original substance contains oxygen, which complicates the calculation. Accurate percentage composition requires clarity on the presence of all elements in the compound.
donniemsb_12
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
A simple of an unknown with plants decomposition of the sample produces 0.09. 48 G of C , 0.1264 g of O and 0.0158 g of H . What is the % composition of the compound ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
donniemsb_12 said:
A simple of an unknown with plants decomposition of the sample produces 0.09. 48 G of C , 0.1264 g of O and 0.0158 g of H . What is the % composition of the compound ?

Looks to me like there is not enough information - are you told whether the original substance contains oxygen, or not?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top