Discussion Overview
The discussion focuses on calculating the heat exchange rate of water inside PEX tubing for a ground source cooling system. Participants explore the theoretical and practical aspects of using PEX tubing in a closed loop system to achieve effective cooling, particularly in relation to an air handler rated at 12 tons.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Mathematical reasoning
Main Points Raised
- Floyd seeks guidance on calculating the cooling capacity of PEX tubing in a closed loop system, aiming for 3-5 tons of cooling using groundwater.
- Some participants inquire about the definition of a "ton" of cooling and its relation to BTUs.
- Thermal conductivity values for PEX tubing are provided, with some variation noted depending on the brand.
- One participant proposes a formula for heat transfer that incorporates various parameters such as thermal conductivity, wall thickness, and fluid velocity.
- Another participant emphasizes the need to specify internal and external diameters of the tubing for accurate calculations.
- Floyd clarifies that the PEX will be submerged in a holding tank and will circulate water through a cooling coil in the air handler, transferring heat from the air to the water.
- Concerns are raised about whether the PEX tubing alone will suffice for cooling or if additional heat exchangers are necessary.
- Participants discuss the importance of maintaining a sufficient temperature difference between the air and water for effective cooling.
- Calculations are presented regarding the potential cooling capacity based on flow rates and tube lengths, with suggestions for spreadsheet modeling to explore different scenarios.
- Floyd mentions that the system may also provide heating in winter, depending on groundwater temperatures.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express varying levels of understanding and assumptions about the cooling system's design and operation. There is no consensus on the optimal configuration or calculations, and multiple competing views remain regarding the effectiveness of the proposed system.
Contextual Notes
Some assumptions about fluid dynamics, temperature gradients, and the specific conditions of the system remain unresolved. The discussion also highlights the dependence on the properties of the materials used and the environmental conditions.