How to Calculate Velocity of a River Using Relative Motion Equations?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the velocity of a river using relative motion equations, one must consider both downstream and upstream travel times. In the first scenario, a boat travels 30 km downstream in 3 hours and returns in 5 hours, leading to a downstream speed of 10 km/hr and an upstream speed of 6 km/hr. The difference in speeds indicates that the river's velocity is 2 km/hr. For the second problem, the combined speed of walking on a moving sidewalk can be determined by adding the walking speed to the sidewalk's speed. Understanding these principles allows for the application of relative motion equations to solve the problems effectively.
JoshMP
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1. A boat takes 3 hours to travel 30 km down a river, then 5 hours to return. How fast is the river flowing?

2. Taking a moving sidewalk, without walking, takes 75 seconds to arrive at baggage claim. Walking, not on the moving sidewalk, takes 50 seconds. How long will it take you to travel the same distance if you walk while riding on the moving sidewalk?

Homework Equations



v= v' + V

The Attempt at a Solution



I know the answers, but I cannot for the life of me figure out how to set them up mathematically. I am confused how the formula above (given by Galileo) is used for these problems. Any help would be great.

Thanks a lot,
Josh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. You have two parts, downstream and upstream. Going downstream the velocity of the river is in the same direction as the velocity of the boat. Going upstream the velocity of the river opposes the velocity of the boat.

2. Well the velocity of walking on the moving sidewalk is the velocity of walking + the velocity of the moving sidewalk. Use an arbitrary distance, x, and figure out what each velocity is.
 
Ergo, the boat travels 10km/hr downstream, and 6 km/hr upstream. It would make sense that the velocity of the river is 2 km/hr, but, again, I don't know how to prove it mathematically.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top