Schools How to compare potential advisers for grad school?

AI Thread Summary
Narrowing down potential advisers requires strategic questioning and thorough research. Key considerations include understanding the expectations advisers have for their students regarding schedules, independence, publishing, and funding. It's crucial to ask about meeting frequency and the adviser’s supervision history, including the success of former students. Engaging in open-ended dialogue during interviews can provide valuable insights.Connecting with current graduate students and post-docs in the department is essential for gathering honest feedback about the adviser. If an adviser is unwilling to facilitate these conversations, it may indicate potential issues. The importance of this step is underscored by the analogy of inspecting a used car before purchase, emphasizing that prospective students should feel empowered to "kick the tires" and ensure a good fit with their future supervisor.
LogicX
Messages
175
Reaction score
1
How do you go about actually narrowing down potential advisers from different schools? What are some tips for visitations that will help with this decision? How does one compare the prestige of different advisers? Counting publications seems silly and asking around your undergrad department could be skewed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here are some questions that I would ask potential supervisors (now that I've been on both sides of this issue):
- What expectations do you have of your students? (With respect to: schedule (daily and over the course of the project), independence, publishing, conference attendence, part-time jobs, etc.)
- How often would we meet?
- Do you prefer formal or informal meetings?
- How many students have you supervised?
- What projects have your former students worked on?
- Were they successful?
- Where are they now?
- How does student funding work?
- How many students do you currently have?

Obviously you don't have to ask these exact questions, but while interviewing with potential advisors it's a good idea to ask open ended questions to initiate a real dialogue. Although some of the questions may seem awkward at first, it's better to get them out of the way up front rather than (as some students do) wondering about them for half of their graduate time.

Another big tip is to talk with both current graduate students and post-docs in the department. This helps avoid getting stuck with somewho who bends the truth in answering such questions.
 
Choppy said:
Another big tip is to talk with both current graduate students and post-docs in the department. This helps avoid getting stuck with somewho who bends the truth in answering such questions.

This is probably the single best, and yet most rarely followed, advice for people looking for a grad supervisor. Ignore it at your great peril, LogicX.
 
How exactly will I have the opportunity to talk with their current grad students? It's not like they are going to let me loose in their lab...
 
Why shouldn't they? When you meet with the advisor, say, "I would like to speak to some of your current students about their experience in the group. Would that be OK?" If they say no, that alone should be a giant red flag. This is someone you're going to be supervised by for years. Good advisors don't take that lightly and want you to have as many opportunities as possible to see if you'll be a good fit.

I once had a professor joke, "The two most important decisions in my life were deciding who to do my PhD under and who I was going to marry. In that order." A bit extreme, perhaps, but it makes the point. You wouldn't buy a car without kicking the tires. If a professor won't let you speak to his or her current students, it's like someone selling a used car who won't let you get an inspection. So go ahead, kick the tires.
 
LastOneStanding said:
Why shouldn't they? When you meet with the advisor, say, "I would like to speak to some of your current students about their experience in the group. Would that be OK?" If they say no, that alone should be a giant red flag. This is someone you're going to be supervised by for years. Good advisors don't take that lightly and want you to have as many opportunities as possible to see if you'll be a good fit.

I once had a professor joke, "The two most important decisions in my life were deciding who to do my PhD under and who I was going to marry. In that order." A bit extreme, perhaps, but it makes the point. You wouldn't buy a car without kicking the tires. If a professor won't let you speak to his or her current students, it's like someone selling a used car who won't let you get an inspection. So go ahead, kick the tires.

I was going to reply to the OP, but there's no way I could have possibly stated it better than LastOneStanding has above.
 
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hi everyone! I'm a senior majoring in physics, math, and music, and I'm currently in the process applying for theoretical and computational biophysics (primarily thru physics departments) Ph.D. programs. I have a 4.0 from a basically unknown school in the American South, two REUs (T50 and T25) in computational biophysics and two semesters of research in optics (one purely experimental, one comp/exp) at my home institution (since there aren't any biophysics profs at my school), but no...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top