How to Convert Units in the Equation \(\alpha = a/d\)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tony873004
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Units
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on converting the equation \(\alpha = a/d\) from radians to arcseconds while changing the units of 'a' from meters to astronomical units (AU) and 'd' from meters to parsecs. Participants clarify that both radians and arcseconds are units of plane angles, and they provide the necessary conversions, including the identity that 1 parsec equals 1 AU per arcsecond. The conversion process involves canceling units appropriately and using defined relationships between the different units. The confusion arises over why radians do not drop off as expected, but it is resolved by recognizing the connection between the units. Ultimately, the conversion is validated through established identities and relationships.
tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143
Starting fromthe equation \alpha=a/d with \alpha in radians and a and d in meters, show that the equation is also valid if \alpha is expressed in arcseconds, a is in AU and d is in parsecs.

Would this be the proper way to show this?

\alpha=a/d
radians=meters/meters
4.8481*10^{-6} radians / arcsecond = \frac{1.49598*10^{11}m/AU}{3.0857*10^{16}m/pc}

Divide the numbers and cancel the m's



4.8481*10^{-6} radians / arcsecond = 4.8481*10^{-6}AU/pc

Cancel the numbers
radians / arcsecond = AU/pc
But radians is still there in the left part of the formula! What did I do wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
U don't need any #-s.Just the definition of a parallaxis arcsecond:

1\mbox{parsec}=:\frac{1\mbox{AU}}{1\mbox{arcsecond}}

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
U don't need any #-s.Just the definition of a parallaxis arcsecond:

1\mbox{parsec}=:\frac{1\mbox{AU}}{1\mbox{arcsecond}}

Daniel.
Thanks, Dex. The problem says we have to start with alpha in radians, a and d in meters and justify it that way. That's why I did it the way I did. I just don't know why the radians won't drop off, like the intuitive answer says they should.
 
They do.Both radians & arcsecond are plane angle units...There's a connection between them

2\pi \ \mbox{radians}<--------------------->(180\cdot 3600) \ \mbox{arcseconds}...

Daniel.
 
Just write down the identities:

4.8481 \cdot 10^{-6} \mbox{rad} = 1 \mbox{arcsecond}, \;<br /> 1.49598 \cdot 10^{11} \mbox{m} = 1 \mbox{AU}, \;<br /> 3.0857 \cdot 10^{16} \mbox{m} = 1 \mbox{parsec}, \; <br /> <br /> \Longrightarrow \frac{\mbox{arcsecond}}{4.8481 \cdot 10^{-6}} = 1 \mbox{rad} = \frac{1 \mbox{m}}{1 \mbox{m}} = <br /> \frac{\left(\frac{\mbox{AU}}{1.49598 \cdot 10^{11}}\right)}{\left(\frac{\mbox{parsec}}{3.0857 \cdot 10^{16}}\right)}

<br /> \Longrightarrow 2.0627 \cdot 10^{5} \mbox{arcsecond} = 2.0627 \cdot 10^{5} \frac{\mbox{AU}}{\mbox{parsec}}

<br /> \Longrightarrow 1\mbox{arcsecond} = \frac{1\mbox{AU}}{1\mbox{parsec}}<br />
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top