I How to create the operator of unknown beamsplitter

Pattarasak
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I'm undergraduate and my project is an experiment in the field of quantum optics. For now, I have an Unknown beamsplitter in my lab and I want to calculate the operator of this beamsplitter in matrix form (this BS is not perfected equipment because the reflected beam is not linear polarization ). Can anyone tell me how to design this experiment and what type of information that I have to measure to calculate the operator? thank you for the answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are ultimately attempting may be more advanced than anything I have done, but for some more introductory material, I presume the beamsplitter has optically flat and very parallel faces, has a finite thickness, and has one side coated with an AR coating. All of the dielectric partial reflection is then assumed to occur from the uncoated face. The Fresnel coefficients can be used to calculate how the splitting occurs. See also the Insights article https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/fabry-perot-michelson-interferometry-fundamental-approach/ that I authored. ## \\ ## I specialize somewhat in Optics, but not Quantum Optics, so that you might be needing quite a bit more than this, but perhaps you might find this of some use.
 
  • Like
Likes Pattarasak
Hi Pattarasak,
If you do a google search for the Hong Ou Mandel experiment you will find many explanations of the way to construct a unitary matrix representation of the beam splitter in quantum optics.
 
  • Like
Likes Pattarasak
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top