How to Derive Equation (1.24) for Potential Due to a Dipole Layer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Azorspace
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dipole Potential
Azorspace
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I wonder if anyone could explain me how to arrive at the equation (1.24). I have attached the part of the book where this appears.


Homework Equations



I have attached the part of the book where this appears.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried to make the second integral zero by performing the gradient and then the remaining algebra but i can't get to this, i suppose that the second integral is zero because in the expression (1.24) it doesn't appear. Using the term that has been expanded i tried to arrive at the integrand in (1.24) but i think that i have to make the second integral zero before this.
 

Attachments

  • potential.jpg
    potential.jpg
    42.2 KB · Views: 1,026
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you do not assume that the second integral is zero. If you are going to make assumptions like this, you need to come up with a good physical or mathematical argument for your assumption.

Instead, notice that the given Taylor approximation can be used on the second integral with \mathbf{x}\to \mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}' and \mathbf{a}\to \mathbf{n}d :

\frac{1}{|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}'+\mathbf{n}d|}=\frac{1}{|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}'|}+\mathbf{n}d\cdot \mathbf{\nabla}\left(\frac{1}{|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}'|}\right)+\ldots

To first order in d, the second integral will give you two terms; one of which will cancel the first integral, and the other produces the desired result as you take the limit in the definition of D(\mathbf{x}').
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top