How to derive impulse response from characteristic impedance

AI Thread Summary
Impulse response can be derived from characteristic impedance (Zo), source impedance (Z_source), and load impedance (Z_load) in coaxial cables used for data transmission. Mismatching these impedances can lead to reflections that create errors in digital communication, particularly affecting the bit error rate (BER). Analyzing the effects of impedance mismatches requires understanding the receiver's input threshold and the impact of transmission line reflections. The first reflection is typically the most significant and correlates with the degree of mismatch. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for optimizing data transmission and minimizing errors.
edaffade
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
i have a coax cable that will be used in data transmission. i have measured the open and short impedance and then characteristic impedance(Zo) for the cable. Eventually I will have a transmitter with Z_source in one end of the cable and receiver with Z_load at the other end of the cable. Is it possible to derive impulse response as a function of Zo,Z_source and Z_load?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Unless the bit rate width is much longer than the coax line, it is not adviceable to to mismatch the source, line and termination impedance. Reflection will create a step change on the logic level and cause error.

In digital communication, you don't deal with standing wave and those, either you have it or you don't.
 
They all will be matched but i want to analyze the effects of mismatches on BER using impulse response to see how much mismatch is tolerable.
 
To do that, you have to know the threshold of the input of the receiver first, that is the most important thing. Then look up the transmission line reflection on step function. Usually only the first reflection step is the biggest and is proportion to the line and termination mismatch.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top