How to Derive Specific Commutation Relations for Lorentz Generators?

  • Thread starter Thread starter G01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qft
G01
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,704
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement



Derive the following commutation relations from the general commutation relation for the Lorentz generators:

[J_i,J_j]=i\hbar\epsilon_{ijk}J_k

[J_i,K_j]=i\hbar\epsilon_{ijk}K_k

[K_i,K_j]=-i\hbar\epsilon_{ijk}J_k

Homework Equations



The commutator for the Lorentz generators:

[M^{\mu\nu},M^{\rho\sigma}]= i\hbar ((g^{\mu\rho}M^{\nu\sigma} - (\mu \leftrightarrow \nu))-(\rho \leftrightarrow \sigma))J_i=\frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{ijk}M^{jk}

K_i=M^{i0}

The Attempt at a Solution



I've got the first one.

The second two I'm having slight problems and just need help finding my mistake.

For the second commutator, I have an extra factor of 1/2 on the RHS. I start from:

[M^{jk},M^{j0}]= i\hbar ((g^{jj}M^{k0} - (\mu \doublearrow \nu))-(\rho \doublearrow \sigma))

Only the first term on the right have side is non zero since all off diagonal g are 0.

Now this implies:

[J_{i},K_j]= \frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{ijk}i\hbar M^{k0}

How do I get rid of that pesky 1/2?

Similarly on the third commutator:

I start from the same place and get to the line:

[K_i,K_j]=[M^{i0},M^{k0}]=-i\hbar M^{ij}

I can't figure out how to put the RHS in terms of J_k without getting a factor of 2!

Any help will be appreciated. I'm sure its just stupid errors. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For part b, I don't think you should be getting to [M^{jk},M^{j0} at all. It looks like you may be mixing up two different indices: the j in
[J_i,K_j] = i\hbar\epsilon_{ijk}K_{k}
is not the same as the j in
J_i = \frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{ijk}M^{jk}
It might help to rewrite the definitions of J and K as
J_a = \frac{1}{2}\epsilon_{abc}M^{bc}
K_d = M^{d0}
to keep the different indices straight.

Then again, I tried to do the problem myself and I'm getting the same extra factor of 1/2 that you are...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top