How to Derive the General Solution for the Hydrogen Radial Equation?

Boosh
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am going through my Quantum textbook, just reviewing the material, i.e. this isn't a homework question. We are solving the radial equation for the Hydrogen Atom, first looking at the asymptotic behavior. My issue is I am completely blanking on how to solve the differential equation:

d^2u/dp^2 = [l(l+1)/p^2]u.

The general solution is:

u(p) = Cp^(l+1) + Dp^-l.

Can someone walk me through the steps of getting to this general solution? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With differential equations, solving them often just means guessing a solution, and then tweaking parameters to get the equations to work out.

You have the equation: \frac{d^2 u}{dp^2} = \frac{\mathcal{l}(\mathcal{l}+1)}{p^2} u.
You guess: u = p^\alpha.

Then \frac{du}{dp} = \alpha p^{\alpha-1} and \frac{d^2 u}{dp^2} = \alpha (\alpha -1) p^{\alpha - 2}. Plugging this into the differential equation gives:

\alpha (\alpha - 1) p^{\alpha - 2} = \frac{\mathcal{l}(\mathcal{l} + 1)}{p^2} p^\alpha

For the equation to be true, \alpha (\alpha - 1) = \mathcal{l} (\mathcal{l} + 1)

So two possibilities are: \alpha = -\mathcal{l} and \alpha = \mathcal{l} + 1

The general solution is a linear combination of the solutions.
 
  • Like
Likes Boosh
Ok, thank you so much!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top