How to derive this heat input equation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation and understanding of a specific heat input equation used in the context of heat engines operating between two thermal reservoirs. Participants explore the implications of the equation Q_1 = ∫_{T_A}^{T_B} C dT, questioning its validity and the assumptions behind it, particularly in relation to the behavior of the heat engine and the temperatures of the reservoirs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the equation Q_1 = ∫_{T_A}^{T_B} C dT, questioning the conditions under which it holds true, particularly the need for system A to cool to temperature T_B.
  • Another participant requests a specific reference for the equation's application in heat engine problems and summarizes an example involving a heat engine operating between a tank of water and a river.
  • In the example provided, the relationship between work done by the engine and heat input is discussed, with a focus on the efficiency of the engine and the maximum work obtainable.
  • A participant suggests analyzing the final temperature of the tank and the change in entropy for both the tank and the river, raising questions about the assumptions of fixed temperatures for heat reservoirs.
  • One participant argues that in a Carnot cycle, the working substance nearly reaches the temperature of the high-temperature reservoir, suggesting that the temperatures can be treated as fixed during individual cycles but may change over multiple cycles.
  • Another participant clarifies that the working substance does not undergo just one cycle and that the temperature of the tank will decrease over successive cycles, ultimately approaching the temperature of the river.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the heat input equation and the assumptions regarding temperature constancy in heat engines. There is no consensus on the interpretation of the equation or the conditions under which it applies.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their understanding of the assumptions related to heat transfer and the behavior of the working substance in the context of multiple cycles of operation. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the implications of these assumptions on the derivation of the heat input equation.

leo.
Messages
90
Reaction score
4
There's one equation that I've seen being used already, which by itself is quite simple, but I can't understand where it comes from.

The context is as follows: suppose we have one heat engine operating between systems [itex]A[/itex] and [itex]B[/itex] whose temperatures are [itex]T_A>T_B[/itex]. Let's suppose further that the system [itex]A[/itex] has heat capacity [itex]C[/itex].

I've seem many times people using that under these conditions the heat input is:

[tex]Q_1 = \int_{T_A}^{T_B} C dT.[/tex]

Now I really can't see why this is true and I'll make my point. Let's suppose that the heat input is [itex]Q_1[/itex], the heat output is [itex]Q_2[/itex] and the work done by the working substance is [itex]W[/itex]. In that case all we know is that we have

[tex]Q_1 = W + Q_2.[/tex]

The equation I presented would be true if two conditions were met:
  1. During one cycle, the heat rejected by system [itex]A[/itex] is entirely transferred into the working substance;
  2. During one cycle the system [itex]A[/itex] undergoes a process that takes it from temperature [itex]T_A[/itex] to temperature [itex]T_B[/itex];
Now I don't see why this would happen. Especially condition two, it doesn't make any sense. System [itex]A[/itex] would need to cool until it got to the same temperature as system [itex]B[/itex].

I don't see any reason why this process would occur. Furthermore, if it really occurred it would be really strange, because at the end of the cycle, the two systems [itex]A[/itex] and [itex]B[/itex] would be at the same temperature!

So it doesn't make any sense. So how this equation is true? Why the heat input can be given by it anyway? How can one actually make sense of this?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Can you cite a specific reference where the first equation is used to solve a heat engine problem, and can you summarize the analysis?
 
I don't have one specific book reference, indeed I searched for some example of this in books, but couldn't find any one. I've seem this being done in some thermodynamics lectures, in some quite simple examples.

To give one example, summarizing the analysis:
A heat engine operates between a tank containing a volume [itex]V[/itex] of water and a river at a constant temperature of [itex]T_A[/itex]. If the temperature of the tank is initially [itex]T_B[/itex], what is the maximum amount of work which the heat engine can perform?

In that example, the analysis was to use that if the machine has efficiency [itex]\eta[/itex], then [itex]W = \eta Q[/itex]. If a Carnot engine operating between the reservoirs has an effiency [itex]\eta_C[/itex] then [itex]W = \eta Q \leq \eta_C Q[/itex], so that the maximum work would be [itex]W_{\mathrm{max}} = \eta_C Q[/itex]. In the end this heat is found through that equation. For this special case it becomes [itex]Q = c \rho V \Delta T[/itex], where [itex]c[/itex] is the specific heat of water and [itex]\rho[/itex] its density.

Again, I can't see why [itex]Q[/itex] is given like that, with that equation and that specific temperature interval.

This example makes clearer the kind of analysis I'm in doubt?
 
I can help you with this. Let's work the problem.

What is the final temperature of the tank? What is the change in entropy of the tank? If ##Q_A## is the heat transferred to the river, what is the change in entropy of the river (considered an infinite reservoir)?

Chet
 
Thanks for the aid.

Now, with regards to the final temperature of the tank, I believe that's my greatest doubt. I mean, I thought that all heat engines operated between heat reservoirs, that is, their temperature were fixed. Are we dropping this assumption here? If so, my next guess would be that the tank would reach thermal equilibrium with the working susbtance at some temperature [itex]T'[/itex], but I don't know how we could find this temperature here, because we don't know the initial temperature of the working substance.

Indeed by the wording of the problem there seems to be three systems here: the river (system [itex]A[/itex]), the water tank (system [itex]B[/itex]) and the working substance. If there was no working substance, the tank would reach thermal equilibrium with the river and since the temperature of the river is fixed this would mean [itex]T' = T_A[/itex].

The change in entropy of the tank, in this particular case is simple, because we have constant heat capacity [itex]C = \rho V c[/itex] where [itex]c[/itex] is the specific heat of water at constant volume. In that case

[tex]\Delta S_B = \int_{T_B}^{T'} \dfrac{dQ}{T} = \int_{T_B}^{T'} C\dfrac{dT}{T} = C \ln \left(\dfrac{T'}{T_B}\right).[/tex]

Now, if [itex]Q_A[/itex] is the heat transferred to the river, being at constant temperature we would have [itex]T_A\Delta S_A = Q_A[/itex].
 
Hope it's not rude of me to chip in, but I wouldn't worry about the temperature of the working substance. In a Carnot cycle the ws almost reaches the temperature of the high temperature heat reservoir because of (the correct amount of) adiabatic compression, so along the 'top' isothermal there is negligible difference between temperature of the reservoir and that of the ws. Don't forget, this is an IDEAL engine! The same applies along the bottom isothermal, whose temperature the ws reaches by adiabatic expansion.

If I may say so, I think your main difficulty arose because the question didn't say that during an individual cycle there isn't enough heat taken in for the top reservoir to change its temperature significantly. For each individual cycle the engine can be treated as operating between reservoirs of 'fixed' temperature. But over the course of many cycles, the temperature of the top reservoir falls, so the efficiency of the engine keeps falling. This is the argument I pursued in order to answer the question (without using the idea of entropy), but I'll now get out of the way.
 
leo. said:
Thanks for the aid.

Now, with regards to the final temperature of the tank, I believe that's my greatest doubt. I mean, I thought that all heat engines operated between heat reservoirs, that is, their temperature were fixed. Are we dropping this assumption here? If so, my next guess would be that the tank would reach thermal equilibrium with the working susbtance at some temperature [itex]T'[/itex], but I don't know how we could find this temperature here, because we don't know the initial temperature of the working substance.

Indeed by the wording of the problem there seems to be three systems here: the river (system [itex]A[/itex]), the water tank (system [itex]B[/itex]) and the working substance. If there was no working substance, the tank would reach thermal equilibrium with the river and since the temperature of the river is fixed this would mean [itex]T' = T_A[/itex].

The change in entropy of the tank, in this particular case is simple, because we have constant heat capacity [itex]C = \rho V c[/itex] where [itex]c[/itex] is the specific heat of water at constant volume. In that case

[tex]\Delta S_B = \int_{T_B}^{T'} \dfrac{dQ}{T} = \int_{T_B}^{T'} C\dfrac{dT}{T} = C \ln \left(\dfrac{T'}{T_B}\right).[/tex]

Now, if [itex]Q_A[/itex] is the heat transferred to the river, being at constant temperature we would have [itex]T_A\Delta S_A = Q_A[/itex].
Excellent analysis!

What you are missing here is that we are not going to put the working substance through just one pass of a cycle (say, a Carnot cycle), and the cyclic passes that we put the working substance through are not going to all be identical. But the change in entropy for the working substance over each of the passes is going to be zero.

Over each individual cycle, we are only going to remove a tiny amount of heat from tank B and transfer a tiny (smaller) amount of heat to the river A. So the Carnot cycles are going to start out long and skinny on a P-V plot, with the adiabatic expansion and compression legs very long, and the isothermal expansion and compression legs very short. In the first cycle, the temperature of the tank (hot reservoir) will drop slightly, and, in each subsequent cycle it will drop a little more. As the temperature of the tank decreases from cycle-to-cycle, the adiabatic expansion and compression legs will get shorter until, in the end, the temperature of tank B approaches the temperature of the river A. At that point, we will have "run out of gas" (i.e., run out of driving force), and we will no longer be able to do any work. So, based on this, the final temperature T' that you are looking for will be ##T_A##.

You now have enough information to calculate the maximum work.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K